International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research

EDITORIAL
Year
: 2016  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 1--2

Cancer generated lactic acid: Novel therapeutic approach


Kapil Gupta 
 Department of Biochemistry, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India

Correspondence Address:
Kapil Gupta
Department of Biochemistry, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab
India




How to cite this article:
Gupta K. Cancer generated lactic acid: Novel therapeutic approach.Int J App Basic Med Res 2016;6:1-2


How to cite this URL:
Gupta K. Cancer generated lactic acid: Novel therapeutic approach. Int J App Basic Med Res [serial online] 2016 [cited 2022 Jan 20 ];6:1-2
Available from: https://www.ijabmr.org/text.asp?2016/6/1/1/173976


Full Text

Aerobic glycolysis or Warburg effect [1] and increased degradation of glutamine collectively known as reprogrammed energy metabolism are considered as a key metabolic hallmark of cancer. [2] Normal cell metabolize glucose to pyruvate via glycolysis and to carbon dioxide for oxidative phosphorylation under aerobic conditions. In anaerobic conditions, relatively more pyruvate is converted to lactate with less being shifted to mitochondria. On the other hand, cancerous cells even in the presence of oxygen convert glucose to lactate by an altered energy metabolic pathway less efficient than oxidative phosphorylation. [2] This along with increased degradation of glutamine leads to metabolic acidosis with pH of the solid cancers as low as 6.0-6.5. [3],[4],[5]

Many speculations have been proposed for the existence of aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells. One states that this mechanism could provide a proliferative advantage to cancer cells [6],[7] by incomplete utilization of glucose and so providing intermediates to be redirected for biosynthesis of biomolecules for essential cellular components. Other states the lactic acid generation may lead to acid resistant phenotypes, and therefore, the unrestricted proliferation of cancer cells. [6] Otto Warburg proposed the presence of aerobic glycolysis due to some mitochondrial defect [8] although some cancers are reported to revert to oxidative phosphorylation by inhibition of lactic acid generation [9] thus proposing that mitochondrial defect may be partially responsible for it. The altered energy metabolism can also be an adaption for survival in episodes of hypoxic and normoxic conditions as hypoxic cells are considered to be the main utilizers of glucose converting it into lactate. [6],[10] Furthermore, the increased degradation of glutamine also provides glutamine and aspartate, the intermediates for nucleic acid synthesis and an alternative energy source whenever the glucose is not available. [11],[12] The altered energy metabolism may also promote proliferation of angiogenic endothelial cells, thus leading to the synthesis of more vascular bodies. [13]

Earlier lactic acid was thought to be mere metabolic product, [14] but studies have shown that it imparts a regulatory predictive role in the proliferation of cancerous cells, metastasis of cancer and patient survival. [15] Cancer generated lactic acid induced acidosis impede the function of normal immune cells, [16] loss of T-cell function of human, and murine tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [4] and so suppressing the anti-cancer immune response. Another study has shown cancer cells may enhance their survival by inhibiting the anti-cancer immune response through actively maintaining a slightly acidic micro-environment by altering their energy metabolism by controlling their lactic acid production. [17]

Normalizing cancer generated lactic acid and resultant acidification and focusing on altered metabolic pathway may lead to cancer inhibition. Considering this hypothesis that regulation of lactic acid production may lead to a positive effect on control of cancerous growth, studies are on progress to find the inhibitors of aerobic glycolysis. Several small molecules have emerged that exhibit promising anticancer activity in vitro and in vivo, as single agent or in combination with other therapeutic modalities. The glycolytic inhibitors are particularly effective against cancer cells with mitochondrial defects or under hypoxic conditions, which are frequently associated with cellular resistance to conventional anti-cancer drugs and radiation therapy. [18] One recent study has shown the antiglycolytic activity of 3-bromopyruvate on rat mammary tumor cells implanted in rats [19] or dichloroacetate as inhibitors of cancer-cell-specific aerobic glycolysis. [20] The careful planning of therapeutic dose of these anti-cancer inhibitors is necessary as normal cells also derive their energy from it. Other pathways leading to inhibition of generation of lactic acid production are also on trial. Four major types of pH regulator have been identified to be up-regulated in tumor cells, the proton pump, the sodium-proton exchanger family, the bicarbonate transporter family, and the monocarboxylate transporter family (MCT). [21] The bicarbonate administration has been shown to increase the pH of tumors, reduce the formation of spontaneous metastases in mouse models of metastatic breast cancer, and reduce the rate of lymph node involvement. [22] Histone acetylation has also been reported to regulate intracellular pH. As pH decreases, histones are globally deacetylated by histone deacetylases, and the released acetate anions are coexported with protons out of the cell by MCTs, preventing further reductions in pH. [23] All these strategies (inhibition of lactic acid generation, normalization of pH in cancer cells) can be useful for the control of cancer in combination with immunotherapeutic approaches. [24] Inhibition of lactic acid generation of cancers may lead to inhibition of proliferation of cancerous cell by dual pathway via energy depletion, and by reduction of their immunosuppressive activity in the tumor micro-environment. This could be effective for the therapy of almost all of the cancers with promising patient survival.

References

1Feron O. Pyruvate into lactate and back: From the Warburg effect to symbiotic energy fuel exchange in cancer cells. Radiother Oncol 2009;92:329-33.
2Hsu PP, Sabatini DM. Cancer cell metabolism: Warburg and beyond. Cell 2008;134:703-7.
3Webb BA, Chimenti M, Jacobson MP, Barber DL. Dysregulated pH: A perfect storm for cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2011;11:671-7.
4Calcinotto A, Filipazzi P, Grioni M, Iero M, De Milito A, Ricupito A, et al. Modulation of microenvironment acidity reverses anergy in human and murine tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes. Cancer Res 2012;72:2746-56.
5De Milito A, Canese R, Marino ML, Borghi M, Iero M, Villa A, et al. pH-dependent antitumor activity of proton pump inhibitors against human melanoma is mediated by inhibition of tumor acidity. Int J Cancer 2010;127:207-19.
6Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ. Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:891-9.
7Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 2009;324:1029-33.
8Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 1956;123:309-14.
9Fantin VR, St-Pierre J, Leder P. Attenuation of LDH-An expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance. Cancer Cell 2006;9:425-34.
10Draoui N, Feron O. Lactate shuttles at a glance: From physiological paradigms to anti-cancer treatments. Dis Model Mech 2011;4:727-32.
11DeBerardinis RJ, Cheng T. Q's next: The diverse functions of glutamine in metabolism, cell biology and cancer. Oncogene 2010;29:313-24.
12DeBerardinis RJ, Sayed N, Ditsworth D, Thompson CB. Brick by brick: Metabolism and tumor cell growth. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2008;18:54-61.
13Polet F, Feron O. Endothelial cell metabolism and tumour angiogenesis: Glucose and glutamine as essential fuels and lactate as the driving force. J Intern Med 2013;273:156-65.
14Sola-Penna M. Metabolic regulation by lactate. IUBMB Life 2008;60:605-8.
15Hirschhaeuser F, Sattler UG, Mueller-Klieser W. Lactate: A metabolic key player in cancer. Cancer Res 2011;71:6921-5.
16Lardner A. The effects of extracellular pH on immune function. J Leukoc Biol 2001;69:522-30.
17Mazzio EA, Boukli N, Rivera N, Soliman KF. Pericellular pH homeostasis is a primary function of the Warburg effect: Inversion of metabolic systems to control lactate steady state in tumor cells. Cancer Sci 2012;103:422-32.
18Pelicano H, Martin DS, Xu RH, Huang P. Glycolysis inhibition for anticancer treatment. Oncogene 2006;25:4633-46.
19Buijs M, Vossen JA, Geschwind JF, Ishimori T, Engles JM, Acha-Ngwodo O, et al. Specificity of the anti-glycolytic activity of 3-bromopyruvate confirmed by FDG uptake in a rat model of breast cancer. Invest New Drugs 2009;27:120-3.
20Wicks RT, Azadi J, Mangraviti A, Zhang I, Hwang L, Joshi A, et al. Local delivery of cancer-cell glycolytic inhibitors in high-grade glioma. Neuro Oncol 2015;17:70-80.
21Izumi H, Torigoe T, Ishiguchi H, Uramoto H, Yoshida Y, Tanabe M, et al. Cellular pH regulators: Potentially promising molecular targets for cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Rev 2003;29:541-9.
22Robey IF, Baggett BK, Kirkpatrick ND, Roe DJ, Dosescu J, Sloane BF, et al. Bicarbonate increases tumor pH and inhibits spontaneous metastases. Cancer Res 2009;69:2260-8.
23McBrian MA, Behbahan IS, Ferrari R, Su T, Huang TW, Li K, et al. Histone acetylation regulates intracellular pH. Mol Cell 2013;49:310-21.
24Choi SY, Collins CC, Gout PW, Wang Y. Cancer-generated lactic acid: A regulatory, immunosuppressive metabolite? J Pathol 2013;230:350-5.