Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  Users Online: 308 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

 Table of Contents  
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 295  

Gender and prevalence of dengue fever


1 Medical Center, Sanitation 1 Medical Center, Bangkok, Thailand
2 Private Academic Practice, Department of Community Medicine, Dr. DY Patil University, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission06-Jan-2020
Date of Decision30-Jan-2020
Date of Acceptance11-Jun-2020
Date of Web Publication7-Oct-2020

Correspondence Address:
Viroj Wiwanitkit
Department of Community Medicine, Dr. DY Patil University, Pune, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_9_20

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Joob B, Wiwanitkit V. Gender and prevalence of dengue fever. Int J App Basic Med Res 2020;10:295

How to cite this URL:
Joob B, Wiwanitkit V. Gender and prevalence of dengue fever. Int J App Basic Med Res [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 25];10:295. Available from: https://www.ijabmr.org/text.asp?2020/10/4/295/297263



Dear Editor,

We read the publication on “Prevalence of dengue fever in Western Uttar Pradesh, India: A gender-based study” with a great interest.[1] Kumar et al. noted that “Every case of dengue must be screened for NS1Ag and IgMAb to increase the diagnostic precision, despite the males being more affected as compared to females due to sociocultural differences.[1]” We would like to share ideas on this report. First, despite the use of both antibody and antigen test, there is still a chance of false result and there is still a possibility of concurrent infection (such as Chikungunya infection).[2] In addition, the use of immune-screening test for dengue should be carefully considered for cost-effectiveness. Although there is a previous study from India showing that the immunological screening for dengue was superior than molecular-based screening,[3] there is still no comparative cost-effectiveness analysis for immunological screening versus classical clinical diagnosis. In endemic area, the diagnosis of dengue is generally based on the clinical diagnosis.[2] Regarding sexual difference, the exact relationship between sociocultural background and gender-specific dengue infection rate should be further assessed. In fact, in endemic developing country,[4] additional factors that are related to preventive behavior against dengue also include educational background and age.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Kumar M, Verma RK, Mishra B. Prevalence of dengue fever in Western Uttar Pradesh, India: A Gender-Based Study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res 2020;10:8-11.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Wiwanitkit V. Dengue fever: Diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2010;8:841-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Anand AM, Sistla S, Dhodapkar R, Hamide A, Biswal N, Srinivasan B. Evaluation of NS1 antigen detection for early diagnosis of dengue in a tertiary hospital in Southern India. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:DC01-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Van Benthem BH, Khantikul N, Panart K, Kessels PJ, Somboon P, Oskam L. Knowledge and use of prevention measures related to dengue in northern Thailand. Trop Med Int Health 2002;7:993-1000.  Back to cited text no. 4
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed67    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded15    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal