Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  Users Online: 147 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 42-46  

Development and implementation of module for medical graduates to improve socio-cultural sensitivity towards people living with HIV


1 Department of Community Medicine, GSL Medical College, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, GSL Medical College, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India

Date of Submission02-May-2017
Date of Acceptance19-Oct-2017
Date of Web Publication20-Dec-2017

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sushanta Kumar Mishra
Department of Community Medicine, GSL Medical College, NH-16, Rajanagaram, Rajahmundry - 533 296, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_153_17

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Background: Health professionals are documented as an important cause for stigmatizing people living with HIV (PLHIV). Since traditional teaching on HIV in India does not address cultural competencies, medical graduates lack sociocultural sensitiveness while addressing the health needs of PLHIV. Aim: The aim of this study is to develop and to implement a module for medical graduates to improve their sociocultural sensitivity toward PLHIV. Methodology: A module was designed and introduced to address the core sensitive issues in HIV among medical graduates with the help of trained faculty. It included community education sessions including interaction with PLHIV to address cross-cultural issues and understand their health needs. Feedback for the perception of faculty and students was obtained. Knowledge and skills improvement was assessed through pre- and post test and direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS). Results: Mean feedback score was high for all the components covered by the module. It was found to be more for “usefulness of module” (4.91 ± 0.27836 on a scale of 5) than other components of the module. Feedback by faculty showed almost perfect agreement on “improvement of student's clinical skills” and “bringing perfection in their future practice” across multiple raters. Multiple response open-ended feedback showed, 78 (19%) responses affirmed improvement in communication skills with training in this module. Pre- and post test mean score for knowledge showed an increase (22.1 to 26.49). Mean skills improvement as per expectations were 86.81 and beyond expectations were 5.34. Conclusions: Training the medical graduates in structured HIV specific module improves their socio-cultural sensitivity toward PLHIV and is perceived useful.

Keywords: Medical graduates, module, people living with HIV/AIDS, sociocultural sensitivity


How to cite this article:
Mishra SK, Dash S. Development and implementation of module for medical graduates to improve socio-cultural sensitivity towards people living with HIV. Int J App Basic Med Res 2017;7, Suppl S1:42-6

How to cite this URL:
Mishra SK, Dash S. Development and implementation of module for medical graduates to improve socio-cultural sensitivity towards people living with HIV. Int J App Basic Med Res [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Dec 2];7, Suppl S1:42-6. Available from: https://www.ijabmr.org/text.asp?2017/7/5/42/221304




   Introduction Top


India has the highest number of medical colleges in the world. This unprecedented growth has occurred in the past few decades in response to increasing health needs. The curriculum of undergraduate medical courses in India needs a major reform to handle more complex health problems.

HIV/AIDS is a one of the tough problems which is perpetuated by high-risk behavior, lack of a concrete cure, attached stigma, and discrimination. People living with HIV and AIDS (PLHIV) not only face discrimination from the society but also from the healthcare professionals during their day to day encounter in the hospitals. In this context, bridging the gap between this marginalized group and the health and social system is a tremendous task in a country like India where sexual matters are considered as taboo and rarely discussed.

PLHIV face discrimination in the society. Health professionals are often perceived to be an important cause of stigma for PLHIV.[1],[2] Conventional teaching on HIV/AIDS in India does not address cultural competencies.[3] Therefore, medical graduates lack socio-cultural sensitiveness in addressing the health needs of this marginalized population group restricting their access to mainstream health-care system.[4]

Hence, it was anticipated that administering an HIV-specific module would improve their overall socio-cultural sensitivity toward PLHIV. The present study was conducted with an objective to develop a standard module for same and its implementation among medical graduates, assess the outcome and perception of the faculty and students.


   Methodology Top


The study was carried out with 106 MBBS third professional students posted in five batches each for 15 days of field exposure in the Department of Community Medicine. Those who agreed to participate through an open invitation were trained on this module by a core group of 20 faculty members from the Department of Community Medicine, Respiratory Medicine, and Clinical psychiatry who were trained in facilitating activities such as think pair share, group discussion, role play, and communication skills. The study was conducted at a tertiary care medical institute in “East Godavari” district of Andhra Pradesh with above 3% HIV prevalence. Prerequisite permission was taken from the Institutional ethics committee. All the participating clinical batches of third professional students were presensitized about the module and its implementation before obtaining consent. Adequate care was taken by offering them the full module so that the student did not feel being isolated even if they opt out of the study.

A module was designed by the research team adapting the WHO guideline for teaching HIV/AIDS in medical schools.[5] Following the AETC (AIDS Education and Training Centre) model,[6] a three-tier activity was designed to enhance the cultural sensitivity comprising of awareness, attitude, and skills. The module covered core sensitive issues in HIV such as doctor–patient relationship, values and belief, cultural and epidemiological aspects, life cycle events, and cross-cultural communication.[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14] The 10 h module consisted of six sessions such as didactic lecture, group discussion (think pair share), cinemeducation, case scenario discussion, and role play. Interaction with PLHIV volunteers was included, with appropriate measures to ensure confidentiality and comfort, with an objective to address cross-cultural issues and understand their health needs. The module was validated by peer experts and pilot tested on the 7th semester students. Principal components of the feedback questionnaires were analyzed and internal consistency checked (Cronbach's alpha = 0.76) by independent experts.

Feedback on the module and its implementation was obtained from faculty and students using predesigned, pretested, and validated anonymous questionnaires comprising of five-point Likert scale. Students were also asked about the future utility of this module through a closed-ended multiple response question. Qualitative information about the knowledge gained from training in this module and its utility in medical career was obtained from the faculty narratives. They were transcribed, translated, coded for thematic analysis, and analyzed by multiple raters for reliability. Pre-and post-comparison test was conducted with the same sets of validated questions to evaluate the improvement in knowledge. Evaluation of skills assessed through DOPS and feedback was given to the students.

Collected data were entered into MS excel worksheet (version 2010) and analyzed using SPSS (version 20) software. Mean and standard deviation were calculated. Student t test was used to compare between 2 means while analysis of variance was used to compare more than 2 means. For categorical variables, the number and percentage distribution were calculated. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Kappa score was used to check reliability.


   Results Top


Feedback of the module by the faculty included in this project showed high mean scores for ability to sensitize about PLHIV and their health needs. There is no significant mean difference (P > 0.05) between different components of the modules, and therefore, all the components have a high agreement. The mean score was found to be more for “usefulness of module” (4.91 ± 0.27836 on a scale of 5) than other components of the module [Table 1].
Table 1: Feedback analysis on module components

Click here to view


Similarly, feedback of the module among students showed that there was no significant mean difference (P > 0.05) in all aspects, i.e., the students strongly agreed in all the aspects of the module in Likert scale. Mean score was found to be more in overall “quality” (4.6122 ± 0.65839) and “content” (4.6053 ± 0.66002) of module notes [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Mean comparison of responses on module

Click here to view


Perception of faculty and students about the outcome of the module [Table 2] suggested that the mean score is high in “achieving the objective” (4.95 ± 0.224) and (4.76 ± 0.578). The mean score was also high for “knowledge gained as per expectations” (4.85 ± 0.489) and (4.65 ± 0.633). Thematic analysis from the faculty narratives showed that a maximum number of responses (14/20) goes with the “improvement in clinical competency for students.”
Table 2: Faculty and student perception about the outcome of the module (n=20)

Click here to view


Inter-rater agreement between the responses among faculty suggested that almost perfect agreement on the improvement of clinical skills (κ = 1) and perfection in their future practice (κ = 0.97) across multiple raters. However, there was a weak agreement on student's clinical competency (κ = 0.46) and empathy toward patients (0.32). There was also no agreement on student's capability on independent decision-taking (κ = 0.1) [Table 3].
Table 3: Frequency distribution of thematic analysis from faculty narratives

Click here to view


Student's feedback on future utility of the training on module collected through the multiple response instrument revealed that 78 (19%) responses mentioned improvement in communication skills followed by 67 (16%) affirming dealing with HIV patients in future in a more sensitive manner and 58 (14%) opinions saying that it will help them understanding HIV problem better due to module-based training.

Totally 106 students were assessed for gain in knowledge after implementing the module. The pre- and post comparison score (out of a total score of 30) showed the mean score as 22.1 and 26.49, respectively, which was statistically found to be highly significant (P < 0.01) [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Mean comparison of test scores

Click here to view


Evaluation of improvement in skills was conducted through DOPS. Students were judged on six criteria [Figure 3]. The study suggested that the skills met the expectations in all six DOPS stations such as history taking (81.13%), communication (84.90%), clinical examination (92.45%), patient-centered skill (81.13%), empathy and dignity (87.73), and reassurance (93.39%). Mean skill improvement as per expectations (5 to 7 score) were 86.81 and beyond expectations (7–9 score) was 5.34.
Figure 3: Evaluation of skills assessment through direct observation of procedural skills (n = 106)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The prepared module can be used appropriately by introducing it to the curriculum. Khademalhosseini et al. conducted a comparative study with the help of empathy score among medical students at both basic and clinical levels. It showed that the lowest empathy score was seen in the 7th year students (55.51), whereas the highest was among the 1st year students (65.50).[15] Lin et al. in their study on empathy and avoidance in treating patients living with HIV/AIDS among service providers in China AIDS care found that empathy was higher among participants aged 31–40 years. They also found that nurses, younger providers, and providers of lower education tend to avoid contact with PLHIV.[16] That strengthens our effort to introduce this educational intervention at this point to understand this population better and develop empathy among the medical graduates.

As most of the studies advocate introducing empathy and humanities at the beginning of the medical curriculum,[12],[13],[14] the present study demonstrates that an improvement in cultural sensitivity can be achieved by the proper blending of knowledge and clinical practice focusing on marginalized population for a stigmatized disease.

A study conducted by Ozakgül, Şendir, Atav, and Kızıltan [17] to find out the attitude and empathic tendencies of Turkish undergraduate nursing students toward HIV/AIDS patients suggested that attitudes and empathic tendencies are related to knowledge and exposure to patients. In their study, they also found that those students with more positive attitudes had higher empathic tendencies toward HIV/AIDS patients. In the present study, we also attempted to demonstrate that bringing positive attitude using more than one modalities of teaching improves the attitude and skills.

In another study conducted by Lange-Tichelaar et al., total 171 nurses from sub-Saharan Africa) Tanzania, South Africa and Rwanda completed the blended e-learning training program with onsite workshops and a 12-week distance-based self-study period. It was found that the overall knowledge increased up to 14.5% after completion of the training program. For each of these modules, the knowledge increase was significant (P < 0.005). This was compared with baseline AIDS attitude scores toward PLHIV and found to increase after completion of the training. On a scale from 1 to 6, the average score for empathy was 5.3.[18] This supports our observation on increase in knowledge and empathy skill through a module based learning.

Some of the suggestions which came from the faculty were on condensing the module into few sessions, conducting a 360° assessment for students, involving lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender population into the interaction group, etc., More interactive session at the beginning of the module and taking feedback after the end of each part of the module were some of the other suggestions.

However, this study had few limitations too.

  • Almost all students included in the study attend classes regularly. There is no representation of the students who do not attend classes regularly
  • All the students of the same batch could not participate in this study because the only batch of students posted in Department was included
  • The students could not go to the PLHIV houses to understand their social surroundings because of the fear of identification and subsequent ethical issues.



   Conclusions Top


In this study, the core cultural issues related to HIV/AIDS were explored and sensitive issues such as doctor–patient relationship, values and belief, cultural aspects, life cycle events, and communication were addressed. This will help the medical graduates understand about the disease better and develop overall empathy.

Therefore, encouraging the medical graduates and providing them with an opportunity to get trained through an HIV-specific module will improve their socio-cultural sensitiveness toward PLHIV.

Acknowledgment

I acknowledge the guidance and help provided by the following individuals/groups/organizations in conducting this study.

  • People living with HIV volunteers
  • Konaseema Seva mandali (NGO partner)
  • Student participants from VI and VII semester
  • CMCL FAIMER faculty and peer group
  • Mr. N. Lakshman Kumar, statistician.


Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Bharat S, Aggleton P, Tyrer P. India: HIV and AIDS-related Discrimination, Stigma and Denial. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2001.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Vyas KJ, Patel GR, Shukla D, Mathews WC. A comparison in HIV-associated stigma among healthcare workers in urban and rural Gujarat. SAHARA J 2010;7:71-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Ekstrand ML, Ramakrishna J, Bharat S, Heylen E. Prevalence and drivers of HIV stigma among health providers in urban India: Implications for interventions. J Int AIDS Soc 2013;16:18717.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Cianelli R, Ferrer L, Cabieses B, Araya A, Matsumoto C, Miner S, et al. HIV issues and mapuches in chile. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 2008;19:235-41.   Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Teaching HIV/AIDS in Medical Schools. New Delhi: World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia; 1999 p. 9-20.   Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
The AETC Trainers' Reference and Resource Manual [Internet]. 1st ed. San Francisco: Pacific AIDS Education and Training center; 2017. Available from: https://aidsetc.org/sites/default/files/resources_files/pacific-RefMan-2009-09.pdf. [Last cited on 2017 Nov 19].  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Gozu A, Beach MC, Price EG, Gary TL, Robinson K, Palacio A, et al. Self-administered instruments to measure cultural competence of health professionals: A systematic review. Teach Learn Med 2007;19:180-90.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Shen Z. Cultural competence models and cultural competence assessment instruments in nursing: A literature review. J Transcult Nurs 2015;26:308-21.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Campinha-Bacote J. The process of cultural competence in the delivery of healthcare services: A model of care. J Transcult Nurs 2002;13:181-4.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Jirwe M, Gerrish K, Emami A. The theoretical framework of cultural competence. J Multicult Nurs Health 2006;12:6-16.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Jirwe M, Gerrish K, Keeney S, Emami A. Identifying the core components of cultural competence: Findings from a Delphi study. J Clin Nurs 2009;18:2622-34.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.
Boyle DP, Springer A. Toward a cultural competence measure for social work with specific populations. J Ethn Cult Divers Soc Work 2001;9:53-71.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Batistatou A, Doulis EA, Tiniakos D, Anogiannaki A, Charalabopoulos K. The introduction of medical humanities in the undergraduate curriculum of Greek medical schools: Challenge and necessity. Hippokratia 2010;14:241-3.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
Abdel-Halim RE, Alkattan KM. Introducing medical humanities in the medical curriculum in Saudi Arabia: A pedagogical experiment. Urol Ann 2012;4:73-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
15.
Khademalhosseini M, Khademalhosseini Z, Mahmoodian F. Comparison of empathy score among medical students in both basic and clinical levels. J Adv Med Educ Prof 2014;2:88-91.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.
Lin C, Li L, Wan D, Wu Z, Yan Z. Empathy and avoidance in treating patients living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) among service providers in china. AIDS Care 2012;24:1341-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.
Özakgül, A.A, Şendir, M. Attitudes towards HIV/AIDS patients and empathic tendencies: a study of Turkish undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today 2014;34:929-33.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Lange-Tichelaar T. Training Healthcare Professionals in Resource-Limited Settings on HIV Care and Treatment: Implementation of a Blended-Learning Training Program in Sub-Saharan Africa. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283697746. [Last accessed on 2015 Nov 19].  Back to cited text no. 18
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Discussion
   Conclusions
   Introduction
   Methodology
   Results
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1495    
    Printed24    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded118    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal