|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 217-219
Human papillomavirus in urothelial carcinoma of bladder: An Indian study
Uttam K Mete1, Sunil Shenvi2, Mini P Singh3, Anuradha Chakraborti4, Nandita Kakkar5, Radha Kanta Ratho3, Arup K Mandal1
1 Department of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
2 Consultant, Multiorgan Transplantation & HPB Surgery, Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, India
3 Department of Virology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
4 Department of Experimental Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
5 Department of Histopathology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
|Date of Submission||10-Mar-2018|
|Date of Acceptance||28-Aug-2018|
|Date of Web Publication||20-Nov-2018|
Dr. Sunil Shenvi
F2, Sunflower Apt, Khanapur Road, Near 3rd Gate, Tilakwadi, Belgaum - 590 006, Karnataka
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Objectives: To study the role of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV-16 and HPV-18) types in the causation of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder in Indian population. Methods: 50 patients with Urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder were included in the study. Another 10 age-matched subjects who were hospitalized for transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia and/or ureterorenoscopy for ureteric stone disease were enrolled as controls. The tissue samples were analyzed for the presence of HPV-16 and HPV-18 DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The histopathology of the tumor tissue was carried out to assess the grade of the tumor. Results: The mean age of the patients was 54.1 years. A total of 28 (56%) patients had high-grade tumors and 22 (44%) had low-grade disease. T2 or higher stage disease was observed in 18 (36%) patients. All cancerous specimens and control specimens were found to be negative by PCR for the presence of HPV DNA. Conclusion: HPV prevalence in the urothelium is very low irrespective of the stage and grade of the disease, and hence, it is unlikely to be the causative agent for urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder in Indian population. However, the role of other HPV types in the etiology of this tumor needs to be clarified.
Keywords: Human papillomavirus-16, human papillomavirus-18, urinary bladder cancer, urothelial carcinoma
|How to cite this article:|
Mete UK, Shenvi S, Singh MP, Chakraborti A, Kakkar N, Ratho RK, Mandal AK. Human papillomavirus in urothelial carcinoma of bladder: An Indian study. Int J App Basic Med Res 2018;8:217-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Mete UK, Shenvi S, Singh MP, Chakraborti A, Kakkar N, Ratho RK, Mandal AK. Human papillomavirus in urothelial carcinoma of bladder: An Indian study. Int J App Basic Med Res [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Jun 6];8:217-9. Available from: http://www.ijabmr.org/text.asp?2018/8/4/217/245823
| Introduction|| |
Association with human papillomaviruses (HPVs) infection has been documented with anogenital tract malignancies, including cervical and vulvar cancer, a subset of oropharyngeal cancers, and certain types of skin cancer. It has been seen that approximately 90% of cervical and vulval carcinomas contain HPVs. Since the urinary bladder is in direct connection with genital area through urethra, HPV may also play a role in the causation of bladder cancer. Although the causal relationship between HPV and urothelial carcinoma of the bladder has been evaluated by several groups, the findings are widely divergent showing the presence of HPV DNA in 0%,,, to 35%–52%,, of bladder cancers. Hence, the present study was designed to test for the presence of HPV DNA in urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder in Indian population.
| Methods|| |
50 patients with Urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder were included in the study. Another 10 age-matched subjects who were hospitalized for transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia and/or ureterorenoscopy for ureteric stone disease were enrolled as controls. All patients provided written informed consent before enrollment. This study was conducted according to the guidelines set up by the Declaration of Helsinki (modified 2000). The institutional ethics committee approved the protocol. The bladder biopsies were obtained from these individuals and divided into two parts; one part was kept in formalin for histopathological examination and the other part was sent to virology laboratory in viral transport media under aseptic precautions and stored at −20°C in a deep freezer till tested further for the detection of HPV-16 and HPV-18 DNA.
The DNA extraction was carried out from the tumor tissue by the conventional phenol-chloroform method. The HPV-16 and HPV-18 types were detected using type-specific primers as described by Jain et al. The type-specific primers for high-risk type 16 were forward primer, 5’AAGGCCAACTAAATGTCAC3’; reverse primer, 5’CTGCTTTTATACTAACCGG3’ and type 18 were forward primer, 5’ACCTTAATGAAAAACCACGA3’; reverse primer, 5’CGTCGTTTAGAGTCGTTCCTG3’ as described earlier. The 25 μg reaction mix consisted of 100–200 ng DNA, 10 mmol/L Tris-Cl (pH 8.4), 50 mmol/l KCl, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 12.5 μmol/L of each dNTP, 5 pmol of each oligonucleotide primer, and 0.5 U of TaqDNA polymerase. The temperature profile used for amplification consisted of initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min followed by 30 cycles with denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s with final extension of 4 min. To check the adequacy of DNA extraction, beta-globin was used as the internal control. The primers,, used were forward primer, 5’GAG GAA CCA AGG ACA GGT AC 3’; reverse primer, 5’CCA CTT CAT CCA CGT TAC ACC3’, which give an amplified product of 268 bp. The amplification product of HPV-16 was obtained at 217 bp and HPV-18 at 100 bp. Negative control sample (double distilled water instead of template DNA in polymerase chain reaction [PCR] mixture) and positive control (plasmid DNA of HPV-16 and HPV-18; positive samples from cervical carcinoma patients) were included in parallel with patient samples in each PCR run. The positive controls used were plasmid DNA of HPV-16 and HPV-18. Precautions were taken to prevent contamination during each experiment such as change of gloves and performing different procedures in separate areas. Analysis of amplified product was performed on 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: Agarose gel electrophoresis of products obtained by human papillomavirus polymerase chain reaction. Lane 1: Molecular weight markers (100 bp ladder), Lane 2: Positive control (plasmid DNA of human papillomavirus 16 showing 216 bp product), Lane 3: Positive control (plasmid DNA of human papillomavirus 18 showing 100 bp product), Lane 4–8: Representative samples positive for beta globin gene product at 268 bp, Lane 9: Negative control|
Click here to view
| Results|| |
The age of the patients ranged from 44 to 79 years (mean 54.1 years). Majority of the patients were males (96%) and smokers (75%). On cystoscopy, the mean number of lesions was 2.74 and 74% of the lesions were papillary with a mean size of 2.84 cm.
The histological grade and stage of 50 tumors obtained from cases are shown in [Table 1]. Out of these 50 patients, 28 (56%) had high-grade tumors and 22 (44%) had low-grade disease. T2 or higher stage disease was seen in 18 (36%) patients.
DNA was isolated from tumor tissue and subjected to PCR for the detection of HPV-16 and HPV-18. Experiments were repeated with positive control for several times. All the 50 transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) bladder tissues were negative for HPV DNA using PCR. Further, HPV DNA was negative in the bladder tissue collected from the control subjects. The adequacy of DNA extraction was checked by amplification of the housekeeping gene globin [Figure 1]. Specific product of beta-globin gene was obtained at 250 bp in majority (47/50) of the samples.
| Discussion|| |
The fact that the HPV plays an important role in oncogenesis has been a landmark discovery in the field of medical scienceand accordingly, previous studies have attempted to determine a possible role for the virus in cancers of the urinary bladder. Further, the role of an infectious agent Schistosoma haematobium has been well established in the etiology of bladder cancer.
The present study aimed to study the role of HPV in the causation of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in Indian population. HPV DNA could not be detected in any of the 50 tissues tested although 28 of these were high-grade tumors. The result is in agreement with majority of recent reports which suggest that HPV is unlikely to be involved in the etiology of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.,,, We used highly sensitive PCR to detect HPV in a protectively acquired, fresh frozen tumor sample and all precautions were taken to avoid any possible contamination of the specimen. To rule out any problem in nucleic acid extraction, the internal housekeeping gene was amplified in the majority (94%) of the samples. Association of HPV and bladder cancer in previous studies is inconsistent. This variation may be due to multiple reasons such as low number of patients included in the study, lack of homogeneity in patient population, contamination during tissue analysis, and use of different method of detection of HPV such as PCR, immunohistochemistry, and southern blotting. Recently published two meta-analyses by Jimenez-Pacheco et al. and Li et al. concluded that there is a significant but moderate association between HPV prevalence and bladder cancer and reported an overall prevalence of 16.9%., However, other studies have shown no association of HPV with bladder cancer as described previously.,,, Both meta-analyses found geographical variation with the prevalence being highest in Asia (24.6%)., Our study also negates this observation.
There was no evidence of HPV infection in bladder tissue obtained from 10 control subjects recruited in the study. However, two of the previous studies have reported high HPV detection rate in both tumor tissue and normal urothelium., In these studies, it is possible that false-positive results may have arisen as a result of urethral contamination as there is evidence to support the urethra as a reservoir for HPV in literature. Maloney et al. minimized the risk of urethral contamination by assessing only bladder tumor samples obtained at radical cystectomy but found no evidence of HPV positivity in any tumors studied using this protocol. Nevertheless, urethral contamination is not the sole explanation as one of the German studies reported detecting HPV in six of 21 (29%) bladder TCC but in only two of 32 (6%) samples derived from urethral swab.
Our study suffered from few limitations. These include a small sample size and the tissue samples were tested for the presence of high-risk HPV types 16 and 18 DNA only. The L1 gene PCR was not performed in our study since the main aim of the study was to see the prevalence of only HPV-16 and HPv-18 as there are no clear-cut studies which have shown the association of HPV with bladder cancer. A recently published study involving Central European population has also failed to find any HPV in bladder cancer tissues in spite of using PCR to detect broad range of HPV.
| Conclusion|| |
The results of this study show that HPV-16 and HPV-18 are unlikely to be involved in the causation of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder, especially in Indian patients. However, the role of other HPV types in the etiology of this tumor needs to be clarified.
We want to thank Dr. Emde Villiers, Germany, for providing positive controls (plasmid DNA of HPV-16 and HPV-18) for the present study.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Schmid SC, Thümer L, Schuster T, Horn T, Kurtz F, Slotta-Huspenina J, et al.
Human papilloma virus is not detectable in samples of urothelial bladder cancer in a central European population: A prospective translational study. Infect Agent Cancer 2015;10:31.
Ben Selma W, Ziadi S, Ben Gacem R, Amara K, Ksiaa F, Hachana M, et al.
Investigation of human papillomavirus in bladder cancer in a series of Tunisian patients. Pathol Res Pract 2010;206:740-3.
Knowles MA. Human papillomavirus sequences are not detectable by Southern blotting or general primer-mediated polymerase chain reaction in transitional cell tumours of the bladder. Urol Res 1992;20:297-301.
Youshya S, Purdie K, Breuer J, Proby C, Sheaf MT, Oliver RT, et al.
Does human papillomavirus play a role in the development of bladder transitional cell carcinoma? A comparison of PCR and immunohistochemical analysis. J Clin Pathol 2005;58:207-10.
Badawi H, Ahmed H, Ismail A, Diab M, Moubarak M, Badawy A, et al.
Role of human papillomavirus types 16, 18, and 52 in recurrent cystitis and urinary bladder cancer among Egyptian patients. Medscape J Med 2008;10:232.
Berrada N, Al-Bouzidi A, Ameur A, Abbar M, El-Mzibri M, Ameziane-El-Hassani R, et al.
Human papillomavirus detection in Moroccan patients with bladder cancer. J Infect Dev Ctries 2013;7:586-92.
Cai T, Mazzoli S, Meacci F, Nesi G, Geppetti P, Malossini G, et al.
Human papillomavirus and non-muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer: Potential relationship from a pilot study. Oncol Rep 2011;25:485-9.
Preparation and analysis of eukaryotic genomic DNA, Sambrook J, Russell W. Molecular Cloning, A laboratory Manual, the third edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Chapter 6, protocol 5, 2001. p. 6.23-6.25.
Jain N, Singh V, Hedau S, Kumar S, Daga MK, Dewan R, et al.
Infection of human papillomavirus type 18 and p53 codon 72 polymorphism in lung cancer patients from India. Chest 2005;128:3999-4007.
Singh MP, Kaur M, Gupta N, Kumar A, Goyal K, Sharma A, et al.
Prevalence of high-risk human papilloma virus types and cervical smear abnormalities in female sex workers in Chandigarh, India. Indian J Med Microbiol 2016;34:328-34.
] [Full text]
Singh MP, Gupta N, Deepak T, Kumar A, Ratho RK. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for the detection of high-risk-human papillomavirus types in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cervical tissues. Indian J Med Microbiol 2017;35:113-5.
] [Full text]
Khullar G, Singh S, Saikia UN, Kumar A, Singh MP, Kanwar AJ, et al.
Squamous cell carcinoma of the nail fold masquerading as pyogenic granuloma. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2016;82:555-7.
] [Full text]
Jimenez-Pacheco A, Exposito-Ruiz M, Arrabal-Polo MA, Lopez-Luque AJ. Meta-analysis of studies analyzing the role of human papillomavirus in the development of bladder carcinoma. Korean J Urol 2012;53:240-7.
Li N, Yang L, Zhang Y, Zhao P, Zheng T, Dai M, et al.
Human papillomavirus infection and bladder cancer risk: A meta-analysis. J Infect Dis 2011;204:217-23.
Anwar K, Naiki H, Nakakuki K, Inuzuka M. High frequency of human papillomavirus infection in carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Cancer 1992;70:1967-73.
Rotola A, Monini P, Di Luca D, Savioli A, Simone R, Secchiero P, et al.
Presence and physical state of HPV DNA in prostate and urinary-tract tissues. Int J Cancer 1992;52:359-65.
Maloney KE, Wiener JS, Walther PJ. Oncogenic human papillomaviruses are rarely associated with squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder: Evaluation by differential polymerase chain reaction. J Urol 1994;151:360-4.
Ludwig M, Köchel HG, Fischer C, Ringert RH, Weidner W. Human papillomavirus in tissue of bladder and bladder carcinoma specimens. A preliminary study. Eur Urol 1996;30:96-102.