Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  Users Online: 1964 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 300-302  

Successful pregnancy after excision of cesarean scar endometriosis with uterovesicocutaneous fistula: A rare case report


Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

Date of Submission31-Mar-2016
Date of Acceptance29-Aug-2016
Date of Web Publication19-Oct-2016

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Pooja Tandon
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2229-516X.192586

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Scar endometriosis is an infrequent type of extrapelvic endometriosis. The most common extrapelvic form of endometriosis is cutaneous endometriosis, involving scar tissues occurring after obstetric or gynecologic procedures such as episiotomy, hysterotomy, cesarean section, and even laparoscopic surgery. The clinical presentation of scar endometriosis, i.e., tender swellings, mimics other dermatological and/or surgical conditions and delays the diagnosis. Scar endometriosis very rarely can get complicated with uterocutaneous fistula with a reported incidence of very few cases in world literature. We report a case of a 36-year-old woman presenting with scar endometriosis with complicated uterocutaneous fistula 11 years after her last lower segment cesarean section, managed successfully with laparotomy-fistulectomy and sleeve resection of the bladder with repair followed by successful subsequent spontaneous conception and pregnancy terminated by lower segment cesarean section.

Keywords: Endometriosis, lower segment cesarean section, uterovesicocutaneous fistula


How to cite this article:
Juneja SK, Tandon P, Chopra I. Successful pregnancy after excision of cesarean scar endometriosis with uterovesicocutaneous fistula: A rare case report. Int J App Basic Med Res 2016;6:300-2

How to cite this URL:
Juneja SK, Tandon P, Chopra I. Successful pregnancy after excision of cesarean scar endometriosis with uterovesicocutaneous fistula: A rare case report. Int J App Basic Med Res [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Nov 21];6:300-2. Available from: http://www.ijabmr.org/text.asp?2016/6/4/300/192586


   Introduction Top


Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrium-like stroma and glands outside the uterine cavity. It generally occurs in the pelvic sites such as the ovaries, cul-de-sac, uterine ligaments, pelvic peritoneum, bowel, and rectovaginal septum. Extrapelvic endometriosis can be found in unusual places such as in the nervous system, thorax, urinary tract, gastrointestinal tract, and cutaneous tissues; among them, the most frequent location is the abdominal wall. There are various theories concerning the scar endometriosis. One of them is the direct implantation of the endometrial tissue in scars during the operation. Under the optimal hormonal stimulus, these cells may proliferate (cellular transport theory) or the neighborhood tissue may undergo metaplasia, which leads to scar endometriosis (coelomic metaplasia theory). By lymphatic or vascular pathways, the endometrial tissue may reach the surgical scar and then cause scar endometriosis.


   Case Report Top


A 36-year-old female P2L1 presented in October 2013 with the complaint of pain and swelling on the cesarean scar on and off for 11 years. In addition, she described cyclic bleeding along with pus from this cesarean scar for 11 years. She previously had one spontaneous vaginal delivery 14 years ago and cesarean section 12 years back in view of nonprogression of labor. She described pain over the cesarean scar at the lower end that increased during the menstruation and then noticed a swelling over cesarean scar at the lower end. She noticed mild bleeding from scar within the 1st days of her menstruation followed by pus. Examination revealed a well-healed cesarean scar, moderately pigmented area, tenderness at the lower end of the vertical infraumbilical scar on palpation. Ultrasound [Figure 1] showed that ill-defined hypoechoic lobulated lesion 3.3 cm × 2.7 cm is seen in relation to the superior surface of the uterus till skin surface at the site of scar. A linear fluid-filled tract was also seen within it. Based on characteristic history and examination findings, the most probable diagnosis of scar endometriosis with uterocutaneous fistula was kept. The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy. Intraoperatively, an inverted Y-shaped fistula was identified with the help of a thin infant feeding tube connecting abdominal skin with the uterus and to the dome of the bladder. Fistulous tract excised out and the specimen was sent to the pathology department. Left salpingectomy was done in view of hydrosalpinx, and as bladder dome had some swelling attached to the fistulous tract, sleeve resection of the bladder with repair was done in single continuous layer. Uterus was also closed in two layers. Histopathology of the excised tract confirmed endometriosis. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful and her pain subsided. There was no bleeding and discharge from scar afterward. She conceived spontaneously in May 2014, she was a booked pregnancy in our hospital, and her antenatal period was uneventful. She underwent emergency lower segment cesarean section in view of fetal distress and preterm premature rupture of membranes at 34 weeks 2 days of gestation. She delivered a healthy male baby of birth weight 2.42 kg. The patient's postoperative period was uneventful.
Figure 1: Ultrasound picture showing fistulous tract

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Endometriosis is the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity and can be seen in intra- and extra-abdominal locations. Extrapelvic endometriosis is rare, but there are reports of endometriosis in almost all locations, including kidneys, lungs, and central nervous system.[1] The previous reports of endometriosis in cesarean section scars have reported the incidence as between 0.03% and 0.4%.[2] A study by Akbulut et al.[3] in 2010 reported the incidence as 0.1% of women who undergo a cesarean section.

Direct mechanical implantation seems to be the most plausible theory for explaining scar endometriosis.

During cesarean section, endometrial tissue might be seeded into the wound, and under the optimal hormonal influences, these cells proliferate. The endometrial tissue may have certain abilities that make implantation and transplantation possible during pregnancy. The interval between prior surgical treatment and onset of symptoms ranged from 1 to 20 years.[4] The incidence of concomitant pelvic endometriosis with scar endometriosis has been reported to be ranging from 14.2% to 26%.[5] Ideally, all patients must be examined for concomitant pelvic endometriosis, and at this point, postoperative follow-up should be done for a couple of years and the patient should be under the observation of the gynecologist. Diagnosis of scar endometriosis should involve detailed history taking and pelvic examination. Sonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology can be used, but it is usually diagnosed by surgical excision [6] and histopathological examination.

Although a rare event, malignant transformation of abdominal wall endometriosis is a possibility.[1] A case study by Stevens et al. suggested that endometriosis in a cesarean scar can transform into metastatic adenocarcinoma.[7] Complete surgical excision including the adjacent fascia or skin is the recommended treatment for scar endometriosis.[8] Therefore, wide excision with at least 1 cm margin is considered the treatment of choice, even for recurrent lesions. Several prophylactic procedures have been proposed to prevent residual contamination of the wound. As it is accepted, inoculation of endometrium into the surgical area is the most common cause of abdominal wall endometriosis, it is strongly recommended that the used sponge should be discarded immediately after cleaning the uterine cavity, the suture material used for uterus should not be reused while closing abdominal wall, and finally the surgical area should be cleaned thoroughly and irrigated with saline solution before closure.[9]


   Conclusion Top


Endometriosis should be considered a diagnosis in a patient presenting with a pain in an abdominal scar, particularly with a history of a cesarean section, even many years after the original surgery. Careful closure and avoidance of contamination (changing gloves, needles before closure) following cesarean section may prevent scar endometriosis.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Drukala Z, Ciborowska-Zielinska B, Kubrak J, Rogowska D. Outcome of a multimodal therapy of a recurrent adenocarcinoma arising from caesarean section scar endometriosis – A case report. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2010;15:75-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Nominato NS, Prates LF, Lauar I, Morais J, Maia L, Geber S. Caesarean section greatly increases risk of scar endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010;152:83-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Akbulut S, Sevinc MM, Bakir S, Cakabay B, Sezgin A. Scar endometriosis in the abdominal wall: A predictable condition for experienced surgeons. Acta Chir Belg 2010;110:303-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Koger KE, Shatney CH, Hodge K, McClenathan JH. Surgical scar endometrioma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;177:243-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Rani PR, Soundararaghavan S, Rajaram P. Endometriosis in abdominal scars – Review of 27 cases. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1991;36:215-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Teng CC, Yang HM, Chen KF, Yang CJ, Chen LS, Kuo CL. Abdominal wall endometriosis: An overlooked but possibly preventable complication. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2008;47:42-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Stevens EE, Pradhan TS, Chak Y, Lee YC. Malignant transformation of endometriosis in a cesarean section abdominal wall scar: A case report. J Reprod Med 2013;58:264-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Douglas C, Rotimi O. Extragenital endometriosis – A clinicopathological review of a Glasgow hospital experience with case illustrations. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;24:804-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Chatterjee SK. Scar endometriosis: A clinicopathologic study of 17 cases. Obstet Gynecol 1980;56:81-4.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Abdominal wall endometriosis: A monocentric continuous series and review of the literature
Hale Goksever Celik,Tolga Karacan,Cihan Kaya,Mehmet Uhri,Ayse Ozge Savkli,Pinar Yalcin Bahat,Tansu Altintas,Taner Usta,Ibrahim Polat,Husnu Gorgen,Engin Oral
Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders. 2019; 11(2): 95
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Uteroabdominal Wall Fistula After Cesarean Section in a Patient With Prior Colorectal Resection for Endometriosis: A Case Report and Systematic Review
Chloé Chattot,Patrick Aristizabal,Sofiane Bendifallah,Emile Daraï
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1335    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded135    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal