Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  Users Online: 1992 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 215-219  

Effectiveness of integrated teaching module in pharmacology among medical undergraduates


Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College and New Civil Hospital, Surat, Gujarat, India

Date of Submission16-Dec-2015
Date of Acceptance11-Apr-2016
Date of Web Publication26-Jul-2016

Correspondence Address:
Preeti P Yadav
C.1105, Shyam Rachna, Near VIP Plaza, VIP Road, Surat, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2229-516X.186962

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Context: Over the years with advancement of science and technology, each subject has become highly specialized. Teaching of medical students has still remained separate in various departments with no scope of integration in majority of medical institutes in India. Study was planned to have an experience of integration in institute and sensitize faculty for integrated teaching–learning (TL) method. Aims: To prepare and test effectiveness of integrated teaching module for 2nd year MBBS student in pharmacology and to sensitize and motivate faculties toward advantages of implementing integrated module. Settings and Design: Education intervention project implemented 2nd year MBBS students of Government Medical College and New Civil Hospital, Surat. Subjects and Methods: Students of second MBBS were divided into two groups. One group was exposed to integrated teaching sessions and another to traditional method. Both the groups were assessed by pre- and post-test questionnaire, feedback and focus group discussions were conducted to know their experience about process. Results: A total of 165 students of the 2nd year MBBS were exposed to the integrated teaching module for two topics in two groups. One group was taught by traditional teaching, and another group was exposed to the integrated TL session. Both the groups have shown a significant improvement in posttest scores but increase in mean score was more in integrated group. During analysis of feedback forms, it was noted that students preferred integrated TL methods since they help in better understanding. Faculty feedback shows consensus over the adaptation of integrated TL methods. Conclusions: Integrated TL sessions were well-appreciated by students and faculties. To improve the critical reasoning skills and self-directed learning of students, integrated TL is highly recommended for must know areas of curriculum.

Keywords: Integrated curriculum, integrated teaching, medical education, strategies, undergraduate


How to cite this article:
Yadav PP, Chaudhary M, Patel J, Shah A, Kantharia N D. Effectiveness of integrated teaching module in pharmacology among medical undergraduates. Int J App Basic Med Res 2016;6:215-9

How to cite this URL:
Yadav PP, Chaudhary M, Patel J, Shah A, Kantharia N D. Effectiveness of integrated teaching module in pharmacology among medical undergraduates. Int J App Basic Med Res [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 May 31];6:215-9. Available from: http://www.ijabmr.org/text.asp?2016/6/3/215/186962




   Introduction Top


Basic science courses are typically taught as standalone, independent content domains in most of the medical colleges in India, which give students a view of the parts, but not the whole, of the structure-function relationship. Every discipline wants to update medical student in their own way. Period of MBBS course is much longer than other professional streams, there is negligible opportunity for interlinking of concepts learned in one discipline with the other. In the end, it becomes responsibility of the student to correlate and integrate all the knowledge gained for diagnosis and treatment of patients. Thus, the lack of integration in current curriculum models leads to poor conceptual understanding. Conventional methods are under criticism for placing too much emphasis on memorization of facts and figures and for overloading the students with excessive details.[1] An integrated curriculum however organizes the material to be learned around an entity that is, conventionally taught by different disciplines.[2]

There are many innovations and trends in medical education that have been undertaken globally which include self-directed learning, problem-based learning, integrated teaching, and community orientation.[3] Various integrated medical curricula have been adopted by many medical schools all over the world to ensure holistic approach rather than a fragmented one which in turn encourages meaningful learning in medical education.[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10] Implementation of an integrated curriculum in its true sense is really not easy and appears to be a Himalayan task.[11]

The students trained with such integrated curriculum, make a more accurate diagnosis than did students trained in a conventional curriculum.[12] The Medical Council of India has stressed upon need-based curriculum that should stimulate student's interest and inculcate drive to learn more.[13] This concept may not be relished by the teachers of both basic and clinical sciences who may feel their interests to be in jeopardy.[14] With the existing medical practices, there is a general dissatisfaction. The main reason for such dissatisfaction has been identified as the present day medical curricula.[15] The existing teaching program in basic sciences in most of the institutes in India is planned and implemented independently by departments without integration.[16] This study was planned to implement integrated teaching module and test its effectiveness on 2nd year MBBS students as well as to sensitize and motivate faculty toward advantages of integration.


   Subjects and Methods Top


The 2nd year MBBS students are regularly attending clinics and wards and also being taught pathological and pharmacological basis of diseases in theory classes by different disciplines separately. Henceforth, the study was planned to make clinical aspects related with topic easily understandable. One sensitization workshop on integrated teaching was held. Faculties were exposed to the concept of integration with the resource person. Participants were given material to read and links for further information. Core group of faculties from nine departments (Medicine, TB and Chest, Psychiatry, Physiology, Microbiology, Pathology, Social and Preventive Medicine, Pediatrics, and Pharmacology) was formed.

Learning objectives and content for two topics “epilepsy and its management” and “tuberculosis (TB) and management” were finalized. Preparation of integrated teaching module was done in five meetings and continuous contact by emails. Learning objectives and content were finalized with consensus between departments. Timetable rescheduling was done to accommodate integrated sessions, the sessions were conducted as per their routine sequence in the second term of second professional. Module was prepared for implementation. Student information sheets and informed consent forms were prepared. The study protocol was submitted before the Institutional Review Board and permission to carry out the project and ethical permission were obtained.

Pre- and post-test; feedback questionnaires for students and faculty; focus group discussion of students and interview of faculties were conducted by persons trained in qualitative research, for evaluation. All the students (165) were divided into two batches. One group has received traditional teaching method which is lectures in separate disciplines. Intervention group has been given integrated teaching by faculty of all departments involved. After completion of “epilepsy and its management” crossover of groups was done and then second topic “TB and management” was covered in a similar manner. Pre- and post-test were taken.

Feedback forms were filled by students and faculties to know their perception. It had two types of questions – seven questions to know their perception about integrated teaching method and its applicability questions with 5-point Likert scale; and two single response questions to know their perception about various teaching–learning (TL) methods. To know the perception of faculty, a feedback questionnaire with 5-point Likert scale was used.


   Results Top


A total of 165 students of 2nd year MBBS were exposed to new teaching intervention in the form of integrated TL sessions. Of these, 136 students gave pre- and post-test both. One hundred and ten students had filled feedback analysis. Exposure of clinical concepts early in MBBS years was liked by many students. Pre- and post-test statistics was calculated by paired sample t-test with the help of SPSS version 16 software. Both the groups (integrated and traditional teaching) had shown a significant improvement in posttest scores [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. In epilepsy integrated group increase in mean scores is higher than in traditional group [Table 1].
Table 1: Pre- and post-test scores: Paired samples statistics

Click here to view
Figure 1: Pre- and post-test mean scores (paired t-test) epilepsy

Click here to view
Figure 2: Pre- and post-test mean scores (paired t-test) tuberculosis tables

Click here to view


Student found small group interactive learning sessions providing greater understanding and active learning opportunity than other TL methods. Students preferred integrated TL sessions second to regularly ongoing small group interactive sessions [Table 2]. Seventy-five percent of students agreed that integrated teaching sessions help them in a better understanding of topic. Many were of opinion this exercise in will reduce the time for study and will help them in understanding clinical aspects of topic from beginning. Some of them stated during focus group discussions that it can increase load of the study. They were not sure whether regular incorporation of this method in curriculum should be recommended or not [Table 3].
Table 2: Teaching-learning method which provides greater understanding

Click here to view
Table 3: Student feedback

Click here to view


Students were apprehensive about whether they have to read all the subjects by themselves after these sessions. Feedback questionnaire was filled by 14 faculties of nine departments. Almost all faculties agreed that traditional teaching occurs in separate disciplines without any integration. 88.8% of them found integrated TL methods very useful for the greater understanding of the topic and they recommend this method for some “must know” areas of curriculum. Responses are summarized in [Table 4].
Table 4: Feedback from faculty

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


It is a well-known criticism that our medical colleges are producing graduates who are not well-equipped to tackle the health care needs of the society.[17] The relevance of Flexner's recommendations to the current status of medical education in South Asia is striking, in terms of both the progressive nature of his thinking in 1910 and the need to improve medical education in Asia today.[18] The human body comprises various anatomical and functionally interlinked systems. Hence, when students are taught different aspects of the human body separately, they struggle to merge the knowledge gained in the different disciplines whenever faced with a particular health problem. Teaching in parts in various specialty is often perceived as independent of one another. Integrated teaching simply means bridging connections between academic knowledge and practical.[19]

In our institute, Department of Pharmacology is conducting small group interactive learning sessions since years, where instead of one single didactic lecture, small interactive sessions have been conducted by different faculty at the same time. More than 80% curriculum of pharmacology was covered with this method. Whereas only two sessions of integrated sessions were conducted, which can explain their preference for former TL method [Table 2]. Integrated TL sessions were not a routine strategy adapted in institute, attending two sessions where faculty from basic as well as clinical departments were teaching, can be the reason for student's apprehension of increasing study burden [Table 3]. Medical education basically aims to produce medical personnel having sound clinical competences and community orientation with proficient communication skills. All these are very essential to develop critical reasoning skills which can help in solving challenging health problems.[20],[21]

To improve quality of students and to have effective diagnosis and better treatment of the patients, integrated teaching is need of hour.[22] Students who are trained with such an integrated curriculum, make a more accurate diagnosis than did the students trained in a conventional curriculum.[23] This was the first experience of integrated teaching in our institute, integrated teaching was implemented with coordination of nine departments. The results of the study helped in changing faculty attitude and will encourage them to adapt TL methods which will increase student's interest in self-study and improve their critical reasoning skills.


   Conclusions Top


Integrated teaching learning sessions are well appreciated by students and faculties. Coordination between various departments was excellent. Adaptation of more new student centered teaching learning strategies is need of time to increase critical reasoning skills of medical students.

Limitation

Because of lack of time, only two topics (one communicable disease and one noncommunicable disease) were covered in integrated manner, which is very less for any long-term change in habit.

Acknowledgment

I acknowledge the guidance and help provided by the faculty of CMCL FAIMER and Philadelphia FAIMER Center giving us tremendous opportunity to learn and implement new things for betterment of medical education. I am thankful to faculties of all nine Departments were Medicine, Pediatric, TB a Chest, Physiology, Community Medicine, Psychiatry, Microbiology, Pathology, and Pharmacology) for wonderful cooperation. I would also like to thanks Dr. Dhaval Mehta from Department of Business Management for doing statistical analysis in SPSS.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Harden RM. The integration ladder: A tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Med Educ 2000;34:551-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Grant J. Principles of Curriculum Design, in Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice (ed T. Swanwick), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Oxford, UK. 2013. doi: 10.1002/9781118472361.ch3.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Smith SR. Toward an integrated medical curriculum. Med Health R I 2005;88:258-61.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Dubois EA, Franson KL. Key steps for integrating a basic science throughout a medical school curriculum using an e-learning approach. Med Teach 2009;31:822-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Gatenby PA, Martin R. Development of basic medical sciences in a new medical school with an integrated curriculum: The ANU experience. Med Teach 2009;31:829-33.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Nandi PL, Chan JN, Chan CP, Chan P, Chan LP. Undergraduate medical education: Comparison of problem-based learning and conventional teaching. Hong Kong Med J 2000;6:301-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Rao KH, Rao RH. Perspectives in medical education 5. Implementing a more integrated, interactive and interesting curriculum to improve Japanese medical education. Keio J Med 2007;56:75-84.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Shimura T, Aramaki T, Shimizu K, Miyashita T, Adachi K, Teramoto A. Implementation of integrated medical curriculum in Japanese medical schools. J Nippon Med Sch 2004;71:11-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Watmough SD, O'Sullivan H, Taylor DC. Graduates from a reformed undergraduate medical curriculum based on tomorrow's doctors evaluate the effectiveness of their curriculum 6 years after graduation through interviews. BMC Med Educ 2010;10:65.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Wilkerson L, Stevens CM, Krasne S. No content without context: Integrating basic, clinical, and social sciences in a pre-clerkship curriculum. Med Teach 2009;31:812-21.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Deepak KK. Integrated teaching: A less trodden path. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2014;58:189-91.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.
Schmidt HG, Machiels-Bongaerts M, Hermans H, ten Cate TJ, Venekamp R, Boshuizen HP. The development of diagnostic competence: Comparison of a problem-based, an integrated, and a conventional medical curriculum. Acad Med 1996;71:658-64.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Salient Features of Regulations on Graduate Medical Education; 1997. Available from: http://www.mciindia.org/RulesandRegulations/GraduateMedicalEducationRegulations1997.aspx. [Last cited on 2016 Feb 10].  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Haranath PS. Integrated teaching in medicine – Indian scene. Indian J Pharmacol 2013;45:1-3.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
15.
Global Strategy for Health for All By Year 2000. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1981.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Badyal DK, Singh T. Teaching of the basic sciences in medicine: Changing trends. Natl Med J India 2015;28:137-40.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Sharma SD, Kacker SK, Adkoli BV. India. In: Sajid AW, McGuire CH, Veach RM, Aziz LR, Gunzburger LK, et al. editors. International handbook of medical education. Westport, Connecticut. London: Greenwood Press; 1994. p. 207-30.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Amin Z, Burdick WP, Supe A, Singh T. Relevance of the Flexner Report to contemporary medical education in South Asia. Acad Med 2010;85:333-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Huber MT, Hutchings P. Integrative Learning: Mapping the Terrain. The Academy in Transition. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities; 2004.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Paul VK. Innovative programmes of medical education: I. Case studies. Indian J Pediatr 1993;60:759-68.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Schmidt H. Integrating the teaching of basic sciences, clinical sciences, and biopsychosocial issues. Acad Med1998;73 9 Suppl: S24-31.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Irby DM, Wilkerson L. Educational innovations in academic medicine and environmental trends. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18:370-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Jamkar A, Yemul V, Singh G. Integrated teaching programme with student-centred case-based learning. Med Educ 2006;40:466-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]


This article has been cited by
1 Integrated teaching in medical education in India: Scope, current status and opportunities
Saurabh RamBihariLal Shrivastava,Prateek Saurabh Shrivastava
Research and Development in Medical Education. 2019; 8(1): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Subjects and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1753    
    Printed17    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded232    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal