|Year : 2013 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 3-10
Recent advances in antibacterial drugs
Jaswant Rai, Gurpreet Kaur Randhawa, Mandeep Kaur
Department of Pharmacology, Govt. Medical College, Amritsar, Punjab, India
|Date of Submission||23-Jan-2012|
|Date of Acceptance||08-Oct-2012|
|Date of Web Publication||18-May-2013|
Junior Resident, 501/5, Shri Ram Colony, Civil Lines, Gurdaspur, Punjab
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
The incidence of antimicrobial resistance is on continued rise with a threat to return to the "pre-antibiotic" era. This has led to emergence of such bacterial infections which are essentially untreatable by the current armamentarium of available treatment options. Various efforts have been made to develop the newer antimicrobials with novel modes of action which can act against these multi-drug resistant strains. This review aims to focus on these newly available and investigational antibacterials approved after year 2000, their mechanism of actions/resistance, and spectrum of activity and their phases of clinical trials. Newer unexploited targets and strategies for the next generation of antimicrobial drugs for combating the drug resistance and emerging pathogens in the 21 st century have also been reviewed in the present article.
Keywords: Biopotentiators, clostridium difficile infection, doripenem, pleuromutilin, virulence inhibitors
|How to cite this article:|
Rai J, Randhawa GK, Kaur M. Recent advances in antibacterial drugs. Int J App Basic Med Res 2013;3:3-10
| Introduction|| |
Serious infections caused by microorganisms resistant to commonly used antimicrobials have become a major healthcare problem worldwide in the 21 st century. This is responsible for the significant increase in morbidity and mortality, longer hospitalization and increased health care costs. Keeping in view the seriousness of this problem, the World Health Organization (WHO) has selected "Antimicrobial resistance: No action today no cure tomorrow" as the theme for World Health Day 2011 as a preventive measure.
In recent years, the number of availability of new antimicrobials for human use across the globe has been lower than in the recent past. No new classes of antimicrobials were developed in the thirty seven years between the introduction of nalidixic acid (1962) and linezolid (2000) and all antimicrobials that entered the market during this time period were modifications of the existing molecules. The development of new antimicrobial agent is very expensive and time consuming, leading to diminishing interest of pharmaceutical industries in it. On an average, research and development of anti-infective drugs takes around 15-20 years, and can cost more than $1000 million.  The cost of bringing a new product to the market is increasing at a rate of 10% per annum. The majority of large pharmaceutical companies have terminated their anti-infective research programs altogether.
In the present review, all new antibacterial agents which have been approved after the year 2000 have been described along with their mechanism of action, development of resistance, spectrum of activity and the stage of developmental in case of yet to be approved drugs. Some newer unexploited targets and strategies for combating drug resistance have also been reviewed.
Recently marketed antimicrobial agents and agents in clinical development
Many new antimicrobial agents with new targets have been marketed recently, while few are still awaiting Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Some of the new agents are in clinical development phase [Table 1].
It is the first drug in this new class of antimicrobial agents which shows narrow spectrum of activity. It is active against Clostridium difficile ection (CDI) and show limited activity against normal intestinal flora.  This drug acts by inhibiting the bacterial enzyme RNA polymerase. 
It is an alternative to the currently used treatment regimens of vancomycin and metronidazole against CDI. In a phase III trial (n0 = 1000), fidaxomicin 200 mg (twice a day) was found to be non-inferior to vancomycin 125 mg (four times a day) for the treatment of initial or first recurrences of CDI. Recurrence rates of CDI with fidaxomicin were significantly lower (13%) as compared to vancomycin (25%).  It is available as oral formulation with recommended dose of 200 mg twice daily.
Ceftaroline fosamil is a prodrug of Ceftaroline. It is a novel broad-spectrum antibiotic effective against Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), penicillin and cephalosporin resistant S. pneumoniae, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA), and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA).  It is also active against many gram-negative pathogens but inactive against extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria. It has been approved for the treatment of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and cSSSTIs. Ceftaroline was developed by modifying the structure of the fourth-generation cephalosporin cefozopran. 
Ceftaroline acts by binding to penicillin binding proteins 1-4 (PBPs 1-4). It shows high affinity for PBP2a present in Staphloccocus aureus, which is responsible for methicillin resistance. In S. pneumonia, ceftaroline can bind to all six PBPs identified (PBP1A, 1B, 2x, 2A/B, and 3). 
Inside the blood circulation, ceftaroline fosamil (prodrug) is rapidly converted to ceftaroline (active form) by phosphatase enzymes. It exhibits linear pharmacokinetics and has a serum half-life (t½) of 1.6 hr (for a single dose) to 2.7 hr (following multiple doses). Volume of distribution (20 l) of ceftaroline is similar to that of other parenteral cephalosporins with plasma protein binding of 20%. Ceftaroline is metabolized by hydrolysis of its β-lactam ring which results into the formation of an inactive, open-ring metabolite called as ceftaroline M-1. It has a low potential for drug interactions because of insignificant metabolism by CYP 450 enzymes.
It is given as 600 mg intravenous dose, every 12 hourly.  Dose adjustment is required in patients with renal impairment as it is primarily eliminated by the kidneys. The most common side effects observed during cSSSI clinical trials were nausea, dysgeusia and caramel-like taste disturbances, vomiting, diarhoea and headache.
It is another newer cephalosporin which has completed its trial in 2007 and is awaiting FDA approval due to additional safety data being demanded by FDA. It is the broad-spectrum antibiotic which shows good spectrum of activity against MRSA, penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and Enterococci.  Ceftobiprole shows strong affinity for PBP2a of MRSA and PBP2x of S. pneumoniae. 
It is given as 1 hr IV infusion of 500 mg every 12 hrs for gram-positive infection and a 2 hr infusion of 500mg every 8 hrs for gram-negative. Dose adjustment is needed in patients with renal impairment.  It is well tolerated with most common side effects being nausea and dysgeusia.
Due to emergence of vancomycin resistant strains, interest has been focused on the development of three newer derivatives of glycopeptides - oritavancin, dalbavancin, and telavancin. Of these, oritavancin and dalbavancin are still in developmental phases while telavancin have been approved by FDA for the treatment of cSSTIs in adults. All three newer glycopeptides are much more potent with lesser potential for development of resistance in comparison to vancomycin. They show rapid bactericidal activity against Vancomycin Resistant Enteroccoci (VRE) and VRSA, unlike vancomycin which is bacteriostatic.
The newer glycopeptides act by inhibiting transglycosylation and transpeptidation reactions of peptidoglycan biosynthesis. Both oritavancin and telavancin shows additional mode of action. They disrupt the membrane potential and thus increase cell permeability causing rapid bactericidal activity. 
Dalbavancin, oritavancin, and telavancin have been well tolerated in clinical trials. ,, Their half lives in humans are approximately 7 days, 15 days, and 7.5 hrs respectively. , This allows longer dosing intervals for dalbavancin and oritavancin. The side effect profile of telavancin includes nausea, vomiting, taste disturbances, QT prolongation, and infusion-related reactions (red-person syndrome).
Mechanism of resistance to vancomycin includes the synthesis of low-affinity precursors by bacteria in which C-terminal D-alanine residue is replaced by D-lactate (D-Lac) or by D-serine (D-Ser).  This mechanism of resistance have been overcome by newer glycopeptides by having high binding affinity to both the precursor substrates (D-Ala-D-Lac and D-Ala-D-Ser) due to presence of hydrophobic side chains in the drug.
It is the newer parenteral carbapenem approved for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and intra-abdominal infections. The drug acts by binding to PBPs and thus inhibiting cross-linking of the peptidoglycan structure. The high binding affinity of doripenem to PBP-2 and -3 may enhance its activity against drug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Thus, it is a suitable alternative to currently available anti-pseudomonal carbapenems (i.e, imipenem, meropenem).  Doripenem has a unique spectrum of activity. It shows activity against gram-positive cocci like imipenem and activity against gram-negative bacilli like meropenem.  Doripenem, like other carbapenems, is stable to ESBLs produced by E. coli and Klebsiella species and to AmpC β-lactamases enzymes; but it is vulnerable to certain acquired β-lactamases like class B metallo-β-lactamases produced by some P. aeruginosa isolates and carbapenemases produced by some Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter species. 
Recommended dose of doripenem is 500 mg IV every 8 hr. Doripenem exhibits linear pharmacokinetics with volume of distribution of 16.8 l. Protein binding is low (8.1%) and is independent of concentrations of drug in the plasma. The estimated elimination half-life of doripenem is 0.95 hr, and 75% of the drug is excreted unchanged in the urine, requiring dosage adjustment in patients with renal impairment.  The most common ADRs are headache, nausea, diarrhea, rash, and phlebitis. Postmarketing reports have also identified Stevens-Johnson syndrome More Details, toxic epidermal necrolysis, interstitial pneumonia, and seizures as adverse drug reactions.
It is another novel carbapenem active against multi drug-resistant gram positive and gram-negative (ESBL producers) bacteria and is currently in trials for cSSSI. 
It is a novel topical antibiotic and the first approved member in this new class. It is approved for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections caused by S. pyogenes and S. aureus which are resistant to the most commonly used topical antibiotics. It is ineffective against gram-negative organisms.  Retapamulin is a semisynthetic pleuromutilin derivative isolated from Clitopilus scyphoides (an edible mushroom). It is a protein synthesis inhibitor which acts by binding to 50-S subunit of bacterial ribosomes.
Plasma protein binding of Retapamulin is 94% and it is metabolized mainly in liver by CYP 3A4 to numerous metabolites.  The most common adverse effect is pruritus at the application site .
Glycylcyclines is a new class of antimicrobials that are chemical derivatives of minocycline.
It is the first glycylcycline approved by FDA for cSSTIs, intra abdominal infections and CAP.  It has been designed to overcome two common mechanisms of tetracycline resistance i.e. resistance mediated by acquired efflux pumps and by ribosomal protection. It acts by binding to 30-S subunit of ribosome, thus inhibiting protein synthesis which is 20 fold more efficient than tetracycline.
Tigecycline has a broader spectrum of activity against aerobic and anaerobic gram-negative and positive pathogens. In vitro data shows that tigecycline has very good antibacterial activity against ESBL as well. It is not active against P. aeruginosa, which is an important gap in its antimicrobial spectrum. 
Tigecycline, formulated for parenteral use only, is given as 100 mg loading dose followed by a maintenance dose of 50 mg every 12 hr. As with all tetracyclines, tissue and intracellular penetration is excellent with large volume of distribution. Protein binding for tigecycline is 71% to 89%.  It has a long terminal elimination half-life of about 36 hr which allows for twice-daily dose administration. Its pharmacokinetics is unaffected by food, age, race, and renal disease.  Primary route of elimination is the biliary excretion so dose adjustment is recommended in hepatic disease.  The side effect profile includes mild GIT disturbances like diarhoea, nausea and vomiting.
Ketolides are the new class of macrolides designed particularly for the treatment of respiratory tract pathogens that have acquired resistance to macrolide antibiotics. Ketolides are semi-synthetic derivatives of the 14-membered macrolide, erythromycin. They are synthesized by substituting a keto- function for the α, L-cladinose moiety at position 3 of the 14-membered erythronolide A ring. Carbonyl group at C3 position is responsible for sensitivity to macrolide resistant strains. 
It is the first ketolide to enter clinical use for the treatment of CAP, chronic bronchitis and acute sinusitis. Other ketolides are under clinical development phase [Table 1]. Telithromycin is a protein synthesis inhibitor that blocks the progression of the growing polypeptide chain by binding to 50-S subunit of the bacterial ribosome. Telithromycin exhibits 10 times higher affinity to the subunit 50-S than erythromycin. In addition, telithromycin strongly bind simultaneously to two domains of 23-S RNA of the 50-S ribosomal subunit, where as older macrolides bind strongly only to one domain and weakly to the second domain [Figure 1].
|Table 2: Herbal drugs and drugs from other natural sources with antibacterial potential|
Click here to view
Telithromycin is more active in vitro against S. pneumoniae compared with clarithromycin and azithromycin and maintains activity against macrolide resistant strains (S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes). 
Telithromycin is formulated as 400 mg tablet for oral administration. It is well absorbed orally with 60% bioavailability. Peak plasma concentration of 2.27 mg/l and a terminal half-life of 9.81 hr is achieved with a single 800 mg daily oral dose.  Telithromycin achieves high tissue concentrations in respiratory fluids and tissues including saliva, alveolar macrophages, epithelial lining fluid, and bronchial mucosa.  Telithromycin is 66-89% bound to serum protein, principally albumin. Drug is cleared primarily by hepatic metabolism, 50% by CYP 3A4 and 50% by CYP independent metabolism. No dose adjustment is required for patients of hepatic failure or mild to moderate renal disease.
Approval of telithromycin was controversial due to trial irregularities, non-inferiority study designs, and the use of foreign safety data. On 12 February 2007, FDA withdrew two of its indications with CAP as the only remaining indication, with a black-box warning issued due to its safety concerns involving hepatotoxicity, myasthenia gravis exacerbation, and visual disturbances. 
Daptomycin is a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic derived from Streptomyces roseosporus and is the first member of this new class of antimicrobials. It was approved by FDA in 2003 for the treatment of SSTIs and approved in 2006 for the treatment of blood stream infections. It shows the unique mechanism of action by inserting its lipophilic tail into the cell membrane of gram-positive organisms without entering the bacterial cytoplasm. This calcium dependent process leads to the formation of channels from which intracellular potassium is lost disrupting the bacterial cell membrane potential and causing cell death. 
Daptomycin is bactericidal against Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and VRE inclusive of linezolid-resistant isolates. It is inactive against gram negative pathogens because of its inability to penetrate its outer membrane. It is poorly absorbed orally, thus administered by intravenous route only. It is highly bound to plasma protein with serum half life of 8-9 hr. Approximately 80% of the administered dose is recovered in urine and only a small amount is excreted in faeces. In July 2010, a warning was issued by FDA about the potential of daptomycin to cause life threatening complication i.e., eosinophilic pneumonia. Seven cases of eosinophilic pneumonia were identified between 2004 and 2010. 
Novel dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors
Iclaprim is a synthetic diaminopyrimidine, a selective inhibitor of the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase, which is similar to trimethoprim. Iclaprim is particularly potent against S. pneumoniae and S. aureus, including trimethoprim-resistant isolates. In contrast to trimethoprim which is most frequently used in combination with sulfamethoxazole, iclaprim is being developed for administration as a single agent, though highly synergistic activity was demonstrated with the sulfonamides like sulfamethoxazole, and sulfadiazine. 
Iclaprim displays linear pharmacokinetics. The protein binding of iclaprim is 92%-94% and half-life is 2-4 hr.  A NDA for iclaprim in the treatment of cSSSIs was submitted to the FDA based on data from two phase III studies (ASSIST-1 and-2). These studies showed that iclaprim 0.8 mg/kg every 12 hr was non-inferior to linezolid.  However, FDA demanded additional clinical data in January 2009 to demonstrate its clinical efficacy for gaining approval. 
Torezolid and radezolid
In the past three decades, oxazolidinones are considered to be the first truly new class of antibacterial drugs. As of the year 2009, linezolid is the only oxazolidinone available in the market for the treatment of gram-positive infections, including those caused by MRSA or VRE. Newer oxazolidinones with improved potency, aqueous solubility and reduced toxicity have been developed by modifications of A, B and C rings of linezolid.  Torezolid and radezolid are two novel oxazolidinones being under research for the treatment of cSSSI and uSSSI respectively, and both have completed phase II clinical trials. Their mechanism of action is similar to linezolid i.e., to prevent the initiation of translation of proteins by binding to the 23-S portion of the 50-S ribosomal subunit.
Torezolid is the active moiety of the prodrug, torezolid phosphate, which has 4-16 fold greater potency than linezolid against gram-positive species including MRSA.  Radezolid is another novel oxazolidinone with increased and broader spectrum of activity as compared to linezolid. In a phase II clinical trial (n = 150) for uSSSIs, a similar cure rate of 97.4% was achieved with 450 mg (once a day) radezolid as compared to 600 mg linezolid (twice a day) against gram positive pathogens.  Resistance to linezolid results from mutations in ribosomal RNA (rRNA) that has been overcome by newer oxazolidinones by additional hydrogen bond interactions with 23-S rRNA.
Newer targets for the next generation antimicrobials for combating drug resistance
There are a number of good clinically efficacious antibiotics in use today; however, the development of bacterial resistance has rendered almost all of them less effective. Most of these are bacteriostatic, and act by either protein or cell wall synthesis inhibition. This critical situation necessitates the designing of novel antibacterial agents with new targets.
Target bacterial proteins
Antibiotics can act to target novel bacterial proteins like inhibiting β-ketoacyl-acyl-carrier-protein synthase I/II enzyme required for fatty acid biosynthesis. Platensimycin is one such drug in preclinical trials which acts by blocking these enzymes involved in the condensation steps in fatty acid biosynthesis. 
Target the virulence factors for rapid clearance of infecting organisms
Virulence inhibitors could target - toxin function e.g., B. anthracis lethal factor catalytic activity; toxin delivery by inhibiting various bacterial systems such as type II or type III secretion; virulence gene regulation that control virulence gene expression; and bacterial adhesion to host cells e.g., inhibition of the formation of pili by pilicides. 
Modulating the host response pathways
Toll-like receptor activators and modulators could potentially have an antimicrobial role by producing antimicrobial peptides that activates the adaptive immune response to combat the infection. 
Therapeutic use of bacteriophages to treat pathogenic bacterial infections
Small, acid-soluble protein (SASPs) genes can be delivered to S. aureus via a S. aureus-specific delivery bacteriophage, resulting in the production of SASPs which can bind to and inactivate bacterial DNA.  These proteins have been shown to be rapidly bactericidal and active against a range of S. aureus strains, irrespective of existing antibiotic resistances.
Combining β-lactamase enzyme with β-lactam antibacterial drug
It can significantly reduce emergence of resistant microbes by taking advantage of the natural phenomenon of inactivation of antibacterial drugs by enzymatic hydrolysis. 
In a Phase II study (n = 112) for the treatment of serious respiratory infections, fifty four patients treated with P1A (β-lactamase product) and ampicillin had a 20% change in gut microflora compared to 50% change in patients treated with ampicillin alone. The β-lactamase would inactivate any unused β-lactam antibacterial drug in the GI tract, thus maintaining the gut microflora. Emergence of ampicillin resistance was also 7-fold lower in patients treated with the enzyme/lactam combination compared to antibacterial drug alone.
Combination of antibiotics with bioenhancers
A bioenhancer is an agent capable of enhancing the bioavailability and efficacy of a drug with which it is co-administered, without any pharmacological activity of its own at the therapeutic dose used.  Bioenhancers can be used to increase the efficacy of commonly used antibiotics, like combining antibiotic tetracycline with non-antibiotic drug loperamide tend to enhance the efficacy of tetracycline by increasing its permeability;  Cow urine distillate (CUD) can act as a potential therapeutic target to enhance the activity of antibacterial agents. CUD when combined with rifampicin increased the activity of drug by about 5-7 times against Escherichia More Details coli and 3-11 times against gram-positive bacteria. 
Newer strategies for antibacterial drug discovery
Most of the current antibacterial drugs were discovered by means of traditional approaches, which are now saturated. This has led to the emergence of drug resistance as well as the emergence of new pathogens, requiring the development and exploration of newer strategies in antibacterial drug discovery.
Antimicrobial peptides derived from vertebrates, invertebrates and microorganisms
These act by interfering with metabolism, targeting cytoplasmic components and disrupting cell membranes. They may also enhance the immunity by functioning as immunomodulators, thus can serve as a novel potential therapeutic target. Examples are dermaseptin derived from frog skin, defensin and crustin from crustacean family and bacteriocin derived from bacteria.  Drugs in the pipeline are omiganan and pexiganan both of which are under clinical trials.
Engineer a prodrug that gets converted into highly potent drug within a microbe
Using prodrug form of a drug, which is converted into highly potent drug within a microbe so that common resistance mechanisms could be bypassed, can be another strategy for new drug discovery.
Engineer hybrid antibacterial drugs for high potency against two targets
Simultaneously two targets can be covered like Mutilin- quinolone hybrid AM-3005 is a Type II topoisomerase inhibitor and also a protein synthesis inhibitor. 
Alternative form of drug delivery methods
Unconventional form of drug delivery methods can be used like inhaled amikacin available as nanoscale liposomal formulation showing potential for treatment of chronic P. aeruginosa lung infections in cystic fibrosis patients by offering advantages such as biofilm penetration and sustained release from liposomes. 
Herbal derivatives as lead molecules
Even herbal drugs, certain plant-derived compounds, their essential oils and medicinal smoke from sublimating the havana sαmagri (mixture of wood and odoriferous and medicinal herbs) can serve as lead molecules and play a significant role in drug discovery and development process [Table 2].
A study was done by Nautiyala et al. in which it was observed that 1 hr treatment with medicinal smoke, released by burning wood and mixture of odoriferous and medicinal herbs, lead to 94% reduction of bacterial counts by 60 min. Absence of pathogenic bacteria (Corynebacterium urealyticum, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter aerogenes, Klebsiella mobilis, Kocuria rosea, Pseudomonas syringae persicae, Staphylococcus lentus) in the open room even after 30 days is indicative of the bactericidal potential of the medicinal smoke treatment.  Medicinal smoke from natural herbal products have a potential for use as a smoke/inhalational form of drug delivery.
| Conclusion|| |
At the beginning of 21 st century, the widespread emergence of antimicrobial resistance has lead to the ineffectiveness of large number of the current antimicrobials in use. Various efforts have been made to combat this resistance so that newer targets can be identified and next generation of effective antimicrobials be produced.
It is notable that few of the drugs described in this paper are in various phases of clinical trial and some awaiting final regulatory approvals. We can expect these antibacterials to be soon present in market for the treatment of resistant strains once they gain the FDA approval. The post marketing surveillance of these newer drugs in clinical trials is must, once the drug is in the market, as rare adverse events often go un-noticed during trials due to enrollment of selected and limited number of patients. There is urgent need for complete understanding of the various aspects of drug resistance in microbes which can help in the choice of good targets, vital for discovery of new antibacterial drugs. In the near future, the next challenge will be to identify newer agents for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens which are emerging at a rapid rate.
| References|| |
|1.||Birkett D, Brøsen K, Cascorbi I, Gustafsson LL, Maxwell S, Rago L, et al. Clinical pharmacology in research, teaching and health care. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2010;107:531-59. |
|2.||Tannock GW, Munro K, Taylor C, Lawley B, Young W, Byrne B, et al. A new macrocyclic antibiotic, fidaxomicin (OPT-80), causes less alteration to the bowel microbiota of Clostridium difficile-infected patients than does vancomycin. Microbiology 2010;156:3354-59. |
|3.||Nordqvist C. Dificid (fidaxomicin) Approved for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Available from: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/226796.php [Last accessed on 2012 Jan 12]. |
|4.||Poxton IR. Fidaxomicin: A new macrocyclic, RNA polymerase-inhibiting antibiotic for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. Future Microbiol 2010;5:539-48. |
|5.||Ge Y, Biek D, Talbot GH. Sahm DF. In vitro profiling of ceftaroline against a collection of recent bacterial clinical isolates from across the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008;52:3398-407. |
|6.||Ishikawa T, Matsunaga N, Tawada H, Kuroda N, Nakayama Y, Ishibashi Y et al. TAK-599, a novel N-phosphono type prodrug of anti-MRSA cephalosporin T-91825: Synthesis, physicochemical and pharmacological properties. Bioorg Med Chem 2003;11:2427-37. |
|7.||Saravolatz LD, Stein GE, Johnson LB. Ceftaroline: A novel cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:1156-63. |
|8.||Talbot GH, Thye D, Das A, Ge Y. Phase 2 study of ceftaroline versus standard therapy in treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007;51:3612-6. |
|9.||Widmer AF. Ceftobiprole: A new option for treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46:656-8. |
|10.||Kosowska K, Hoellman DB, Lin G, Clark C, Credito K, McGhee P, et al. Antipneumococcal activity of ceftobiprole, a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:1932-42. |
|11.||Chahine EB, Nornoo AO. Ceftobiprole: The first broad spectrum anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus beta-lactam. J Exp Clin Med 2011;3:9-16. |
|12.||Higgins DL, Chang R, Debabov DV, Leung J, Krause KM, Sandvik E, et al. Telavancin, a multifunctional lipoglycopeptide, disrupts both cell wall synthesis and cell membrane integrity in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:1127-34. |
|13.||Kim A, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP. Review of dalbavancin, a novel semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide. Expert Opin Invest Drugs 2007;16:717-33. |
|14.||Leonard SN, Rybak MJ. Telavancin: An antimicrobial with a multifunctional mechanism of action for the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections. Pharmacotherapy 2008;28:458-68. |
|15.||Poulakou G, Giamarellou H. Oritavancin: A new promising agent in the treatment of infections due to Gram-positive pathogens. Expert Opin Invest Drugs 2008;17:225-43. |
|16.||Ward KE, Mersfelder TL, LaPlante KL. Oritavancin: An investigational glycopeptide antibiotic. Expert Opin Invest Drugs 2006;15:417-29. |
|17.||Shaw JP, Seroogy J, Kaniga K, Higgins DL, Kitt M, Barriere S. Pharmacokinetics, serum inhibitory and bactericidal activity, and safety of telavancin in healthy subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:195-201. |
|18.||Walsh CT, Fisher SL, Park IS, Prahalad M, Wu Z. Bacterial resistance to vancomycin: Five genes and one missing hydrogen bond tell the story. Chem Biol 1996;3:21-8. |
|19.||Jones RN, Huynh HK, Biedenbach DJ. Activities of doripenem (S-4661) against drug-resistant clinical pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48:3136-40. |
|20.||Fritsche TR, Stilwell MG, Jones RN. Antimicrobial activity of doripenem (S-4661): A global surveillance report (2003). Clin Microbiol Infect 2005;11:974-84. |
|21.||Mushtaq S, Ge Y, Livermore DM. Doripenem versus Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro: Activity against characterized isolates, mutants, and transconjugants and resistance selection potential. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48:3086-92. |
|22.||Bhavnani SM, Hammel JP, Cirincione BB, Wikler MA, Ambrose PG. Use of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target attainment analyses to support phase 2 and 3 dosing strategies for doripenem. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:3944-7. |
|23.||Livermore DM, Mushtaq S, Warner M. Activity of the anti-MRSA carbapenem razupenem (PTZ601) against Enterobacteriaceae with defined resistance mechanisms. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009;64:330-5. |
|24.||Yang LP, Keam SJ. Spotlight on retapamulin in impetigo and other uncomplicated superficial skin infections. Am J Clin Dermatol 2008;9:411-3. |
|25.||Nagabushan H. Retapamulin: A novel topical antibiotic. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2010;76:77-9. |
|26.||Frampton JE, Curran MP. Tigecycline. Drugs 2005;65:2623-35. |
|27.||Gales AC, Jones RN. Antimicrobial activity and spectrum of the new glycylcycline, GAR-936 tested against 1,203 recent clinical bacterial isolates. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2000;36:19-36. |
|28.||Muralidharan G, Micalizzi M, Speth J, Raible D, Troy S. Pharmacokinetics of tigecycline after single and multiple doses in healthy subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:220-9. |
|29.||Rello J. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of tigecycline. J Chemother 2005;17(Suppl 1):12-22. |
|30.||Sun HK, Ong CT, Umer A, Harper D, Troy S, Nightingale CH, et al. Pharmacokinetic profile of tigecycline in serum and skin blister fluid of healthy subjects after multiple intravenous administrations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:1629-32. |
|31.||Nilius AM, Ma Z. Ketolides: The future of the macrolides? Curr Opin Pharmacol 2002;2:493-500. |
|32.||Zuckerman JM. Macrolides and ketolides: Azithromycin, clarithromycin, telithromycin. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2004;18:621-49. |
|33.||Namour F, Wessels DH, Pascual MH, Reynolds D, Sultan E, Lenfant B. Pharmacokinetics of the new ketolide telithromycin (HMR 3647) administered in ascending single and multiple doses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001;45:170-5. |
|34.||Edlund C, Alvan G, Barkholt L, Vacheron F, Nord CE. Pharmacokinetics and comparative effects of telithromycin (HMR 3647) and clarithromycin on the oropharyngeal and intestinal microflora. J Antimicrob Chemother 2000;46:741-9. |
|35.||US Food and Drug Administration: Department of Health and Human Services. Telithromycin (marketed as Ketek) information. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm107824.htm [Last accessed on 2012 Jan 13]. |
|36.||Hobbs JK, Miller K, O′ Neill AJ, Chopra L. Consequences of daptomycin-mediated membrane damage in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Chemother 2008;62:1003-8. |
|37.||US food and drug administration: Department of health and human services. Cubicin (daptomycin): Drug safety communication-risk of eosinophilic pneumonia. Available from: www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm220499.htm[Last accessed on 2012 Jan 12] |
|38.||Laue H, Weiss L, Bernardi A, Hawser S, Lociuro S, Islam K. In vitro activity of the novel diaminopyrimidine, iclaprim, in combination with folate inhibitors and other antimicrobials with different mechanisms of action. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;60:1391-4. |
|39.||Andrews J, Honeybourne D, Ashby J, Jevons G, Fraise A, Fry P, et al. Concentrations in plasma, epithelial lining fluid, alveolar macrophages and bronchial mucosa after a single intravenous dose of 1.6 mg/kg of iclaprim (AR-100) in healthy men. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;60:677-80. |
|40.||Arpida AG. Iclaprim: Concentrate for solution for infusion. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/08/briefing/2008-4394b3-03-ARPIDA.pdf [Last accessed on 2012 Jan 13]. |
|41.|| PR newswire. FDA issues complete response letter for iclaprim: FDA requests an additional clinical study prior to approval. Available from: http://www.drugs.com/nda/iclaprim_090120.html [Last accessed on 2012 Jan 14]. |
|42.||Vara Prasad JV. New oxazolidinones. Curr Opin Microbiol 2007;10:454-60. |
|43.||Prokocimer P, Bien P, Surber J, Mehra P, DeAnda C, Bulitta JB, et al. A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study evaluating the safety, tolerability, population pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of oral torezolid phosphate in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:583-92. |
|44.||Bagheri F, Bush L, Desanto J, Markowitz A, Merrick B. A phase 2 study comparing two doses of radezolid to linezolid in adults with uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections (L-1515c). In: Proceedings of the 48 th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) 46 th Annual Meeting; 2008 Oct 25-28; Washington DC. |
|45.||Habich D, Von Nussbaum F. Platensimycin, a new antibiotic and "superbug challenger" from nature. Chem Med Chem 2006;1:951-4. |
|46.||Clatworthy AE, Pierson E, Hung DT. Targeting virulence: A new paradigm for antimicrobial therapy. Nat Chem Biol 2007;3:541-8. |
|47.||Liu PT, Stenger S, Li H, Wenzel L, Tan BH, Krutzik SR, et al. Toll-like receptor triggering of a vitamin D-mediated human antimicrobial response. Science 2006;311:1770-3. |
|48.||Wilkinson A, Holmes S, Pitts K. SASP: A novel antibacterial DNA binding protein and its targeted delivery to Staphylococcus aureus. In: Proceedings of the 47 th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2007 Sep17-20; Chicago, USA, Abstract F1-2132. |
|49.||Tarkkanen AM, Heinonen T, Jogi R, Mentula S, Van der Rest ME, Donskey CJ, et al. P1A recombinant beta-lactamase prevents emergence of antimicrobial resistance in gut microflora of healthy subjects during intravenous administration of ampicillin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:2455-62. |
|50.||Randhawa GK, Kullar JS, Rajkumar. Bioenhancers from mother nature and their applicability in modern medicine. Int J App Basic Med Res 2011;1:5-11. |
|51.||Ejim L, Farha MA, Falconer SB, Wildenhain J, Coombes BK, Tyers M, et al. Combinations of antibiotics and nonantibiotic drugs enhance antimicrobial efficacy. Nat Chem Biol 2011;7:348-50. |
|52.||Coutinho HD, Lobo KM, Bezerra DA, Lobo I. Peptides and proteins with antimicrobial activity. Indian J Pharmacol 2008;40:3-9 . |
|53.|| Asahina Y, Nagae O, Sato T, Takadoi M, Ohata K, Shibue T, et al. AM-3005: Synthesis and in vitro antibacterial activity of novel mutilin-quinolone hybrid antibacterial agent (F1-2030); In: Proceedings of the 48 th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) 46 th Annual Meeting; 2008 Oct 25-28; Washington DC. |
|54.||Meers P, Neville M, Malinin V, Scotto AW, Sardaryan G, Kurumunda R, et al. Biofilm penetration, triggered release and in vivo activity of inhaled liposomal amikacin in chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;61:859-68. |
|55.||Roopashree TS, Dang R, Narendra C. Antibacterial activity of antipsoriatic herbs: Cassia tora, Momordica charantia and Calendula officinalis. J App Res Natural Products 2008;1:20-8. |
|56.||Schelz Z, Hohmann J, Molnar J. Recent advances in research of antimicrobial effects of essential oils and plant derived compounds on bacteria. Ethnomedicine: A Source of Complementary Therapeutics 2010:179-201. |
|57.||Chute RK, Deogade NG, Kawale M. Antimicrobial activity of Indian honey against clinical isolates Asiatic J Biotech Res 2010;1:35-8. |
|58.||Sathasivam AK, Muthuselvam M, Rajendran R. Antimicrobial activities of cow urine distillate against some clinical pathogens. Global J Pharmacol 2010;4:41-4. |
|59.||Otto CC, Cunningham TM, Hansen MR, Haydel SE. Effects of antibacterial mineral leachates on the cellular ultrastructure, morphology, and membrane integrity of Escherichia coli and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2010;9:26. Available from: http://www.ann-clinmicrob.com/content/9/1/26. [Last accessed on 2012 Jan 12]. |
|60.||Nautiyal CS, Chauhan PS, Nene YL. Medicinal smoke reduces airborne bacteria. J Ethnopharmacol 2007;114:446-51. |
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||Antimicrobial activity of RP-1 peptide conjugate with ferrocene group
| ||Natalia C. S. Costa,Julia P. Piccoli,Norival A. Santos-Filho,Leandro C. Clementino,Ana M. Fusco-Almeida,Sarah R. De Annunzio,Carla R. Fontana,Juliane B. M. Verga,Silas F. Eto,João M. Pizauro-Junior,Marcia A. S. Graminha,Eduardo M. Cilli,Ilja Kusters |
| ||PLOS ONE. 2020; 15(3): e0228740 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Chemical Composition and Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils from the Algerian Endemic Origanum glandulosum Desf. against Multidrug-Resistant Uropathogenic E. coli Isolates
| ||Larbi Zakaria Nabti,Farida Sahli,Hocine Laouar,Ahmed Olowo-okere,Joice Guileine Nkuimi Wandjou,Filippo Maggi |
| ||Antibiotics. 2020; 9(1): 29 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Current Advances in the Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Pharmacologically Relevant 1,2,4,5-Tetrasubstituted-1H-Imidazole Derivatives
| ||Renzo Rossi,Maurizio Ciofalo |
| ||Current Organic Chemistry. 2019; 23(19): 2016 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Antimicrobial, antioxidant and cytotoxic evaluation of diazenyl chalcones along with insights to mechanism of interaction by molecular docking studies
| ||Harmeet Kaur,Jasbir Singh,Balasubramanian Narasimhan |
| ||BMC Chemistry. 2019; 13(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Novel lavender oil and silver nanoparticles simultaneously loaded onto polyurethane nanofibers for wound-healing applications
| ||Hasham S. Sofi,Towseef Akram,Ashif H. Tamboli,Aasiya Majeed,Nadeem Shabir,Faheem A. Sheikh |
| ||International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2019; 569: 118590 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Synthesis, molecular docking and comparative efficacy of various alkyl/aryl thioureas as antibacterial, antifungal and a-amylase inhibitors
| ||Fayaz Ali Larik,Aamer Saeed,Muahmmad Faisal,Pervaiz Ali Channar,Syed Sikandar Azam,Hammad Ismail,Erum Dilshad,Bushra Mirza |
| ||Computational Biology and Chemistry. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||In vitro activities of kappa -carrageenan isolated from red marine alga Hypnea musciformis : Antimicrobial, anticancer and neuroprotective potential
| ||Ricardo Basto Souza,Annyta Fernandes Frota,Joana Silva,Celso Alves,Agnieszka Zofia Neugebauer,Susete Pinteus,José Ariévilo Gurgel Rodrigues,Edna Maria Silva Cordeiro,Raimundo Rafael de Almeida,Rui Pedrosa,Norma Maria Barros Benevides |
| ||International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2018; 112: 1248 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Synthesis and antibacterial activity of 3-benzylamide derivatives as FtsZ inhibitors
| ||Zhongping Hu,Shasha Zhang,Weicheng Zhou,Xiang Ma,Guangya Xiang |
| ||Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2017; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Current applications of nanoparticles in infectious diseases
| ||Hinojal Zazo,Clara I. Colino,José M. Lanao |
| ||Journal of Controlled Release. 2016; 224: 86 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Synthesis, and prediction of molecular properties and antimicrobial activity of some acylhydrazones derived from $N$-(arylsulfonyl)methionine
| ||Esra TATAR,Sevil SENKARDES,Hasan Erdinç SELLITEPE,Sükriye Güniz KÜÇÜKGÜZEL,Sengül Alpay KARAOGLU,Arif BOZDEVECI,Erik DE CLERCQ,Christophe PANNECOUQUE,Taibi BEN HADDA,Ilkay KÜÇÜKGÜZEL |
| ||TURKISH JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY. 2016; 40: 510 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Recombinant expression and biological characterization of the antimicrobial peptide fowlicidin-2 in Pichia pastoris
| ||Li-Wei Xing,Shi-Xun Tian,Wei Gao,Na Yang,Pei Qu,Di Liu,Jian Jiao,Jue Wang,Xing-Jun Feng |
| ||Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2016; 12(4): 2324 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Metal-Based Antibacterial Substrates for Biomedical Applications
| ||Federica Paladini,Mauro Pollini,Alessandro Sannino,Luigi Ambrosio |
| ||Biomacromolecules. 2015; 16(7): 1873 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Chromone: A Valid Scaffold in Medicinal Chemistry
| ||Alexandra Gaspar,Maria João Matos,Jorge Garrido,Eugenio Uriarte,Fernanda Borges |
| ||Chemical Reviews. 2014; 114(9): 4960 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||In vitro antibacterial and time-kill evaluation of phosphanegold(I) dithiocarbamates, R3PAu[S2CN(iPr)CH2CH2OH] for R = Ph, Cy and Et, against a broad range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
| ||Jiun-Horng Sim,Nazzatush Shimar Jamaludin,Chai-Hoon Khoo,Yoke-Kqueen Cheah,Siti Nadiah Binti Abdul Halim,Hoi-Ling Seng,Edward R. T. Tiekink |
| ||Gold Bulletin. 2014; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
| ||Benjamin N. Breyer |
| ||Urology. 2013; 82(4): 942 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|