Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  Users Online: 296 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 75-79  

Smoking-induced satellite associations in a rural population of south India: An in vitro study


1 Department of Anatomy, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Pillayarkuppam, Pondicherry, India
2 Respiratory Medicine, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Kadirkamam, Pondicherry, India

Date of Web Publication26-Dec-2011

Correspondence Address:
A N Uma
Genetics Division, Anatomy Department, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Pillayarkuppam, Puducherry - 607 402
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2229-516X.91148

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background: Genotoxic carcinogens in cigarette smoke interact with DNA, causing cytotoxicity. Cytogenetic damage therefore seems to be an excellent biomarker for determining the effect of exposure to chromosome-damaging agents in cigarette smoke. Purpose: To study the utility of measurement of frequency of satellite associations (SA) as a biomarker for chromosomal damage using cytogenetic assay in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on 30 smokers and 30 nonsmokers drawn from a rural population of South India. Smokers were divided into three groups of ten each based on their smoking index (SI) (group I: SI < 150, group II: SI 150-300, and group III: SI > 300) and the frequency of SAs was studied. Results: The frequency of SAs was significantly greater in smokers than in nonsmokers and the frequency of SAs among the smokers was also seen to increase with increase in SI. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that the genotoxic effect of cigarette smoke on chromosomes increases with smoking intensity. These findings can be used to support smoking cessation interventions.

Keywords: Chromosome damage, genotoxicity, satellite associations, smoking index


How to cite this article:
Uma A N, Pajanivel R, Raj S, Lokeshmaran. Smoking-induced satellite associations in a rural population of south India: An in vitro study. Int J App Basic Med Res 2011;1:75-9

How to cite this URL:
Uma A N, Pajanivel R, Raj S, Lokeshmaran. Smoking-induced satellite associations in a rural population of south India: An in vitro study. Int J App Basic Med Res [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Feb 15];1:75-9. Available from: http://www.ijabmr.org/text.asp?2011/1/2/75/91148


   Introduction Top


Tobacco use is one of the greatest public health threats the world has faced. Smoking causes a variety of disabilities in man. It kills more than five million people a year - an average of one person every 6 seconds - and is responsible for one in ten adult deaths. More than 80% of the one billion smokers worldwide live in low- and middle-income countries, where the burden of tobacco-related illness and death is heaviest. [1] In India, smoking kills 900000 people every year and unless corrective action is taken that number will soon increase to more than 1 million, indicating that urgent measures are needed to address the problem of tobacco abuse.

The smoker is exposed to a wide variety of genotoxic carcinogens present in cigarette smoke, making it necessary to analyze the cells at metaphase as these can be a health hazard to the future generations. [2] Genotoxic carcinogens in cigarette smoke interact with and alter the DNA molecule, causing cytotoxicity. Cytogenetic damage therefore seems to be an excellent biomarker for determining the effect of exposure to the chromosome-damaging agents in smoke. [3] In support of this hypothesis, an increased frequency of chromosome breaks has been demonstrated to be an initial event in carcinogenesis, suggesting that measurement of these alterations may be useful for assessing oncogenic risk.

The last three decades have witnessed the introduction of a number of relatively rapid genetic tests for detecting the activity of mutagenic and/or carcinogenic chemicals. Satellite chromosomes in associations, appears to be one of the most suitable test to assess the effect of cigarette smoke on chromosomes. Satellite associations (SAs) reflect chromosomal damage and may thus provide a biomarker of early-stage carcinogenesis.

The phenomena of SA, where satellite chromosomes assume a specific position with their satellites directed towards each other, was first observed in mitotic human chromosomes [4],[5] and was later also found in meiotic chromosomes. All 'D' and 'G' group chromosomes (except 'Y' chromosomes) have satellites in their 'p' arm. The formation of SA has often been attributed to the involvement of satellite chromosomes in nucleolar formation. The sticky nucleolar material has a tendency to hold the associated chromosomes together through mitosis.[6] The fusion of two or more nucleoli tends to stretch the nucleolar-forming chromosome segment mechanically, with obvious risk of breakage. Breaks may occur in more than one of the chromosomes involved, and proximity of the broken ends would predispose to translocations and the SA would thus be active also in the origin of translocation between satellite chromosomes.

A high incidence of SA has often been considered to predispose to an increased tendency toward nondisjunction in satellite chromosomes and to lead to the induction of D (trisomy 13 or  Patau syndrome More Details) and G (trisomy 21 or Down syndrome) trisomies. Several workers have reported evidence of an increased acrocentric association in the mothers of children with Down syndrome. [7] Higher frequency of SA was seen in test mothers using oral contraceptives than in control mothers, among couples who had had an abortion, and in XXY Klinefelter and XO Turner syndrome, [8] suggesting that drug intake and chromosomal anomalies predispose to satellite associations. An increased incidence of SA, as well as decreased mitotic index and chromosomal aberrations, have been reported in smokers. [2],[9],[10] Smokers engaged in occupations like farming and workers in industries exposed to variety of chemicals have been shown to have chromosomal damage in somatic cells. [11],[12],[13] Chromosomal damage has also been reported in bidi and hookah smokers. [14],[15] The addition of antioxidants to the diet of the smokers was found to minimize the genotoxicity of the mutagenic agents present in tobacco smoke. [16]

The present in vitro cytogenetic study was conducted to investigate the frequency of SA in smokers and nonsmokers. All subjects were from a rural area and had an agricultural background, all were males, all had rice as their staple diet, and all were from the lower socioeconomic strata.


   Materials and Methods Top


This observational study included 30 male smokers attending a tertiary care hospital; all were from a rural area in South India. The 30 subjects were divided into three groups of 10 each based on their smoking index (SI), as follows: group I: SI < 150, group II: SI 150-300, and group III: SI > 300. SI was calculated using the formula given by Srinivasan et al. [17] :

SI = Numbers of cigarettes/bidis/cigars per day × total duration of smoking in years

An equal number of age-, sex-, diet- and social status-matched nonsmokers formed the control group for the study. None of the individuals were habituated to alcohol or drugs. Ex-smokers and smokers with chromosomal anomalies were excluded from the study. Informed written consent was taken from all participants. The study was designed in accordance with the Helsinki II declaration and approved by the Institutional Human Ethical Committee.

Lymphocyte cultures were set up from heparinized blood, with minor modification of the method of Hungerford, [18] by the addition of chilled fixative at the end of hypotonic treatment. For each person, 50 well-spread metaphase plates, stained with 4% buffered Giemsa, were analyzed for SAs. SAs involve a specific arrangement of acrocentric chromosomes of 'D' group (chromosomes 13, 14, and 15) and 'G' group (chromosomes 21 and 22) with their satellites directed towards each other [Figure 1]. For identifying SAs, the criteria used by Hansson were applied; [7] i.e., the satellite ends of the associating chromosomes had to be directed towards each other with their longitudinal axes meeting between their short arms, and the distance between the centromeres of associated chromosomes should not exceed the total length of one 'G' chromosome after excluding its satellite. Odds ratios and the Student's t-test were used for statistical analysis.
Figure 1: Photomicrograph showing satellite associations between the 'DG' group chromosomes in nonsmokers

Click here to view



   Results Top


The mean age of the subjects was 38.25, 40, 40.75, and 39.67 years in smoker groups I, II, and III, and in nonsmokers, respectively. The mean frequency of SAs in nonsmokers, calculated using the SI formula, was 29.83 ± 2.88 [Figure 1]; whereas the mean frequency of SAs in smokers belonging to group I, II, and III was 44.25 ± 3.30, 53 ± 3.46, and 67 ± 6.22, respectively [Figure 2],[Figure 3],[Figure 4]. The frequency of SAs in smoker groups I, II, and III was higher than in the nonsmokers and, moreover, SA was seen to increase with increase in the SI [Table 1].
Table 1: Satellite associations in smokers and nonsmokers


Click here to view
Figure 2: Photomicrograph showing satellite associations between the 'DDG' group chromosomes in smoker group I

Click here to view
Figure 3: Photomicrograph showing satellite associations between the 'DGGG' group chromosomes in smoker group II

Click here to view
Figure 4: Photomicrograph showing satellite associations between the 'DDG' and 'DGG' group chromosomes in smoker group III

Click here to view


The odds for SAs was greater in smokers as compared to nonsmokers and, among the three smoker groups, the odds increased with increase in SI. The Student's t-test also showed that the differences in SAs between the nonsmoker group and the three smoker groups were highly significant (P<.001) [Table 2].
Table 2: Odds ratios and Student's 't' test


Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Tobacco-related cancer is a common and lethal malignancy. The role of tobacco smoking in the etiology of cancer disease has been known for many decades, and any approach aimed at expediting the detection of population subgroups at increased risk should be assigned high priority. It may be possible to use genotoxicity assays to identify those subgroups of smokers that are more susceptible to the DNA-damaging effect of cigarette smoke and/or to determine the level of smoking that produces significant increases in mutation rates over baseline. Many of the substances contained in cigarette smoke are genotoxic and therefore cytogenetic damage seems to be an excellent biomarker for determining the effect of exposure to chromosome-damaging agents in smoke.

Smokers engaged in different occupations (like farming and industry) with exposure to a variety of chemicals have shown a higher frequency of chromosomal damage in somatic cells than nonsmoking controls working in the same occupations. [11],[12],[13] Increases in the frequencies SAs have been reported with exposure to cigarette smoke, [9],[10] bidi smoke, [14] and hookah smoke. [15] The present report confirms these findings.

The analysis of SAs has gained popularity as an in vitro genotoxicity test and a biomarker assay in humans for genotoxic exposure and effect, as the scoring of SA is relatively simple, requires only a short training, and is not very time consuming. A number of studies have been designed to evaluate the potential influence of factors such as gender, age, or smoking habit on SA frequency. Many of these studies suffer from a poor assessment of exposure, with subjects being often roughly classified as smokers vs nonsmokers, without consideration of the levels of cigarette consumption. The status of those who have stopped smoking has been even more confusing and 'former smokers' are sometimes included along with 'current smokers' and sometimes with 'nonsmokers.' Proper planning of the study to elicit high-quality, reliable, information regarding the individual's smoking habit and possible confounders such as occupational exposures is essential to understand the value of SAs as a marker of exposure/effect on chromosomes.

Keeping the above criteria in mind, in the present study, all the subjects - smokers and nonsmokers - were selected from among the population of a small village; the subjects had the same occupational background, were of the same sex and around same age (40 years), were all from a low socioeconomic strata; we also ensured that the smokers were all exclusively active smokers. In this study there was a higher frequency of SAs in smokers than in the control (nonsmoker) group. Among the smokers, the frequency of SAs increased with increase in SI, indicating clearly that the chromosomal changes are correlated to the smoking intensity. These results are similar to the findings of Yadav et al. [13]

A dose-response effect was also evident, with a steady increase in the odds ratio with increase in SI among the three smoker groups; this clearly demonstrates that there is an increase in the susceptibility to DNA-damaging effect with increase in SI. The 'P' values of the three smoking groups were highly significant compared to their nonsmoking counterpart, indicating that smokers are exposed to more ill health outcome from tobacco smoking.

All the smokers and nonsmokers in our study were agricultural laborers and were exposed to a variety of chemicals, e.g., fertilizers and pesticide sprays. It has been shown that, among subjects exposed to the same occupational hazards, chromosomal damage is more in smokers than in nonsmokers. [12] This synergism also probably contributed to the increased frequency of SAs in the smokers in our study.

In conclusion, our study clearly indicates that all smokers should be considered to be at high risk of developing neoplastic disease. This study indicates that the genotoxic effects demonstrated in the lymphocytes of smokers are most likely caused by cigarette smoke constituents. This scientific evidence can be used in support of national campaigns to prevent tobacco consumption and for devising intervention strategies to reduce the morbidity and mortality from smoking-related cancer.


   Acknowledgment Top


The authors are sincerely grateful to ICMR for awarding the Short-Term Studentship-2010 project to S. Raj. We also thank Prof. N. Ananthakrishnan, Department of Surgery, for his constant encouragement.

 
   References Top

1.WHO Fact Sheet No 339, May 2010.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Falk HL. Chemical agents in cigarette smoke. Lee DH, editor. In: Handbook of Physiology: Reaction to Environmental Agents. Baltimore, MD: Waverly; 1977. p. 199-211.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Hopkin JM, Evans HJ. Cigarette smoke-induced DNA damage and lung cancer risks. Nature 1980;283:388-90.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Ferguson Smith MA, Handmaker SD. Observation on the satellite human chromosomes. Lancet 1961;1:638-40.   Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Ohno S, Trujillo JM, Kaplan WB. Nucleolus organizers in the causation of chromosomal anomalies in man. Lancet 1961;2:123-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Hsu TC, Arrighi FE, Klevecz RR, Brinkley BR. The nucleoli in mitotic divisions of mammalian cells in vitro. J Cell Biol 1965;26:539-53.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
7.Hansson A, Mikkelson M. An increased tendency to satellite association of human chromosome 21: A factor in the etiology of Down's syndrome. IRCS Anat Pediat Psychiat 1974;2:1617.   Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Anuradha N, Satyanarayana M, Manjunatha KR. Satellite Associations in Recurrent Aborters. IJHG 2002;2:61-4.   Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Yadav JS, Thakur S, Chillar AK. Genetic risk assessment in cigarette smokers. J Hum Ecol 2001;10:165-70.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Jose JK, Kuttan R. Inhibition of oxygen free radicals by Emblica officinalis extract and Chyawanprash. Amla Res Bull 1995,15:46-52.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Van Bao T, Szabo I, Ruzicska P, Czeizel A. Chromosome aberrations in patients suffering acute organic phosphate insecticide intoxication. Humangenetik 1974;24:33-57.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Fredga K, Davring L, Sunner M, Bengtsson BO, Elinder CG, Sigtryggsson P, et al. Chromosome changes in workers (smokers and nonsmokers) exposed to automobile fuels and exhaust gases. Scand J Work Environ Health 1982;8:209-21.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Yadav JS, Yadav AS, Sharma T. Chromosome damage in lymphocytes of stainless steel welder. Int J Hum Genet 2001;1:185-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Yadav JS, Thakur S. Genetic risk assessment in Hookah smokers. Cytobios 2000;101:101-3.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.Yadav JS, Thakur S. Cytogenetic damage in Bidi smokers. Nicotine Tob Res 2000;2:97-103.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.Yadav JS, Thakur S, Chadha P. Chyawanprash Awaleha: A Genoprotective Agent for Bidi Smokers. Int J Hum Genet 2003;3:33-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Srinivasan G, Jindal SK, Malik SK. Influence of baseline airway obstruction and degree of smoking on bronchial reactivity in smokers. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 1988;30:78-83.   Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.Hungerford DA. Leukocytes cultured from small innocula of whole blood and the preparation of metaphase chromosomes by treatment with Hypotonic KCl. Stain Technol 1965;40:333-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Neuropharmacological potential of Ceriscoides turgida (Roxb.) leaf and root in mice
Wahid Hafiz,Md Nazmul Hasan Zilani,Nazneen Ahmeda Sultana,Md Mahmodul Isalm,Md Anisuzzman,Md Golam Hossain
Clinical Phytoscience. 2019; 5(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Evaluation of central nervous system (CNS) depressant activity of methanolic extract of Commelina diffusa Burm. in mice
Tania Sultana,Md. Abdul Mannan,Tajnin Ahmed
Clinical Phytoscience. 2018; 4(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Acknowledgment
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2327    
    Printed181    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded938    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal